Breathing and growing with no heir
God gives us a lot of answers. We may be happy He is willing to guide us. He also sheds light unto that what we do have to know.
We do have to have a vision and show others what we do believe. We have to share our faith.
A happy carnival atmosphere at the climate camp in the city 2009
We do have to be concerned about others and have to care more about our people than anyone else, because we are called by Jesus to love people. It is not just because we do have to love others that we do take care of them. No, it is because we want to share the love of God with them. When people are cared for, they care for the things you care for, even more so than you ever could. We have a lot of different encounters in life good, bad, awkward, but there’s nothing better in life than what happens as a result of a God encounter. And we should make use of that, to meet others and show them the result of our experiences with God.
We live in a time where people are not interested in God as such, but many are looking for something they do not know or do not understand. The meaning of life is still something what brings a lot of minds working and questioning. It are the searching souls that we can bring into action to look for a God encounter. There is no better time to pick up our cross and our burden for the city.
Some may think we aren’t called to just preach. Jesus has given the major task to his followers to go out in the world and to let the Good News be known wherever they go. We also as followers of Christ Jesus should let others know that marvellous Good News. Faith is also about doing what God has called you to do. He called Jesus to have the Name of the Creator be known all over the world. And Jesus, willing to preach to every one who wanted to listen, called those listeners to the same task. As such we as Christians follow up the work Jesus has done nearly two thousand years ago.
It takes faith in order to speak with others about the faith, to give them more information about the Word of God and about the Kingdom of God. Talking to others about God, His Laws, His son we can expand the ministry.
God doesn’t give us the perfect people for a perfect team. He gives us people to build up. And we should be happy that we with our shortages can create an appetite to bring all the flaws together to make a pleasant dish. Though it might be difficult we should allow our selves to be humble and to get discipled by our brothers and sisters in the community. All together should make ‘one unit’ in Christ.
Meeting with each other trying to make ‘church’ we should understand that everything needs time and that we have to be patient enough to let everything grow and fall into its right place. When the moment comes to make choices for who is going to do what, everybody should be prepared to be humble enough and to be willing to give all his or her power to build up the community. Just as Paul had Timothy come alongside and help in ministry we should do the same. The person who thinks he is in charge should not think he is losing his job by delegating. It means he begins to train and equip those around him.
To build up the ecclesia all have to form one team. Choices shall have to be made, like looking for the person who has the right capacity, the character and who has the talents.
Ministry is much more than pulpit time. It is all about doing life together, that’s where discipleship happens. In life. When a person is picked or an action is proposed it should also be possible to ask others what they say about them.
Talent never trumps character when picking an heir. Leaders that live out their walk 24/7 have to be raise up. We have to have a shallow leadership pool, one that anyone can dive into. By constructing our ecclesia we do have to be willing also to construct an ark. Remembering that we might be amateurs, but willing to be under the leadership of a Masterbuilder. Day in day out looking for the hand of God on our students. It’s not their talents that will get them anywhere, it is the hand of God.
We always should be enjoying what we are doing. We don’t quit we win. Our job is to fish, not to catch. It is not up to us to change people. God makes it grow.
Whatever we try to build we must believe in what we want to do in the name of God and not in our name. The ecclesia, the event, the group should always be built on faith and prayer. In our construction-work we should continuously evangelize, and encourage our students to evangelize. Their must discipleship and everybody should be wiling to ‘pasrot’ or shepherd them.
Together we should try to grow and inspire each other. It is all about doing life together, that’s where discipleship happens. In life. and for that life we should open our minds and be ready to jump in the life of many, trying to be with them and helping them forwards.
We do know that it was terrible what happened to Christ Jesus, but his willing to die for our sins gives us hope. God showed His love to the world by giving His son. And God’s son showed his love to the world by giving his body. We should share that love and give our spirit and enthusiasm. Love will always be greater than fear, therefore we do not prefer to teach fear but the bright promise God has made of the Kingdom of God.
We do not find the need for preaching fear and do not want to instil fear. We prefer to instil love so that fear has no chance to exist. We who respect and love Jesus look further than sin. When you are so in love with Jesus, you forget to sin. Repentance is not remorse, or resolution. Our faith shall work in us by keeping up the works of faith. Jesus died and rose again so sin would have to stay in the grave. We do not mind showing the world that we now have a life hidden with Christ in God. Christ releases us to live with him and to be accepted to come before his Father as children of God, and as brothers and sisters in Christ.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )Holiness and expression of worship coming from inside
“… the beauty of holiness, the expression of worship, is something which breaks through from inside. It is centred in a heart filled with reverent fear, seeking to discover the will of God and to answer it in humble joy; a life trembling at His word and responsive to His command; walking in the way of God’s appointment, whatever it may be, like sheep content with the pasture which the shepherd has selected; a life of holiness unfolding the beauty which glorifies God.
The phrase occurs in Psalm 29:2, one more proof that worship is achieved by giving glory to God: “Give unto the Lord the glory due unto his name: worship the Lord in the beauty of holiness.” If we seek to do the first in the regular exercise of the life of faith, we shall thereby worship the great God in the daily experience of discipleship.
Psalm 115 reveals a great principle—that men become like the God they worship—false or true. The end of true worship is Godlikeness. This principle is at the root of a great New Testament word: “We shall be like him”. But one thing is essential—that the worship is true.”
- Dennis Gillett
The Genius of Discipleship
Worship – Part 2
The Beauty of Holiness
+
Related articles
- Worship and worshipping (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
-
Listening and Praying to the Father (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Worship Or Playing Church? (womendivas4god.wordpress.com)
Many seem to have the wrong concept of worship. After pondering on Worship, worship is not in the music of particular, it does not matter how old, new, fast or slow it is. God has open my heart and understanding that Christian music is a label we give in flesh. If someone was to play music without any words would you be able to tell if it is Christian music? No. God created music and He loves music. He gives each person their gift be it Rock, contemporary, or R&B. - Worship Him! (apropheticwalk.wordpress.com)
The presence of God was so thick in the sanctuary, that our pastor was unable to preach his message. God just wanted our worship! - Have We Excluded Something Important From Worship? (samuelatgilgal.wordpress.com)
Sound was vital to Old Testament worship. The choral compositions of the Psalms were moving to the Spirit. They were accompanied by the full harmony and rhythm supplied by the harp, the lyre, the flute, and trumpets. The piano and the organ are marvelous instruments, but they cannot produce the sounds that the other instruments provide. Hymns and choral anthems are greatly enhanced when they are supported with greater orchestration. - Preparing for worship (wordsofgrace.wordpress.com)
God’s right to be worshipped (vv. 1-7). Contemplate the reasons we are given that God deserved the worship of Israel, and why we should still worship Him today. What are His attributes that are deserving of worship? - Worship Is About God’s Offering, Not Ours (arendsarticulations.wordpress.com)
worship is not about what we bring to God. If we worship in that mindset, then worship becomes about us, about trying to bring the best offering we can. But don’t get me wrong, I’d say worship is our offering, but it’s not about our offering. It’s about giving thanks to God for His many offerings to us.
Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God
Songs in the night
Get thee hence, Satan:
for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God,
and him only shalt thou serve.
— Matthew 4:10
DURING the forty days in the wilderness our Lord (Jesus) had come to see that the dominion of earth could be attained only through great suffering.
He was weak from his long fast, and all the details of prophecy were before his mind.
He saw himself as a lamb dumb before his shearers;
as the serpent lifted up in the wilderness. Satan’s suggestion was a temptation, but after consideration he saw that Satan was asking him to violate his covenant
— to go contrary to God’s will.
Immediately he answered,
“Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written,
Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God,
and him only shalt thou serve.”
Then the devil left the Lord, finding nothing to work upon
— so loyal was Jesus to the Word of Jehovah.
Afterwards the angels came and ministered unto him.
—Z. 1912-262 (Hymn 200)
+++
Related articles
- Temptation.. (alookintomymind.wordpress.com)
There are many things on this natural earth that tempts us. We come from a falling world. Our flesh dies daily. The question is “Are you strong enough to resist those temptations?”
+
Three times Jesus replied to satan. In all three times he stated “It is written.” He was quoting scripture here.+
When you are being tempted, can you quote scriptures to satan and stand your position as a Son of God? ..bodly cast him and all his evil spirits away from you and renew your mind to what promises you hold as a Son of God. - Nourished by the Word (loopyloo305.com)
And thou shalt remember all the way which theLord thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee, and to prove thee, to know what was in thine heart, whether thou wouldest keep his commandments, or no. - Exodus 24-25 (mybiblereadingplan.wordpress.com)
And he said unto Moses, Come up unto Jehovah, thou, and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel; and worship ye afar off. And Moses alone shall come near Jehovah: but they shall not come nigh; neither shall the people go up with him. - It Is Written – Sunday Devotional (blackanddarknight.wordpress.com)
The written word is also used as evidence – everything spoken in court is written down, certain documents must always be signed.Satan didn’t take this into account when he twisted the 91st Psalmas he tempted Jesus to jump from the temple.
Only worhsip the Creator of all things
10 And I felled down before his feet, to worship him. And he said to me, See thou, that thou do not; I am a servant with thee [And I fell down before his feet, for to worship him. And he said to me, See, that thou do not; I am thine even-servant], and of thy brethren, having the witnessing of Jesus; worship thou God. For the witnessing of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.
- Revelation of John 19:10 Wycliffe translation
10Then I fell prostrate at his feet to worship (to pay divine honors) to him, but he [restrained me] and said, Refrain! [You must not do that!] I am [only] another servant with you and your brethren who have [accepted and hold] the testimony borne by Jesus. Worship God! For the substance (essence) of the truth revealed by Jesus is the spirit of all prophecy [the vital breath, the inspiration of all inspired preaching and interpretation of the divine will and purpose, including both mine and yours].
- Revelation of John 19:10 Amplified version
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 9 so far )
More-Letter-Words
Is it the warm, kind feeling, the fondness or affectionate and tender devotion people mean when the use the four-letter-word “Love“?
We can see a mother’s love for her children; a love of learning or a love of adventure.
The fondness, charity or the affection of the mind caused by that which delights is with the devoted attachment to somebody of this universe is something which has become more rarely. “Love” seems to have become a word which is subtle as a breeze or misty as the damp of the water kettle, taking long to come up but quick to disappear.
For some the word “Love” has gotten a meaning of a sort of possession often more to do with “owning” something or someone, or only to be co-notated with sexual desires and not so much with generosity and caring. Though love has everything to do with softness and magnanimity. Love is bringing an opening to the greatness of the soul, that quality of mind which raises a person above all that is mean or unjust. It is the attitude which a human has to create or to work on of which the Bible, the Word of God, has spend so many words on. It is the capability to make yourself noble and humble. Not wanting to hurt or to bring any damage to an other person. Being meek of heart wanting to get the best for the other person and willing to help him or her to become even better, without expecting something in return. It is the willingness to become submissive to another person.
Today several people would find that week or not “cool”. they consider that power is what we should get, and that we should take on an attitude by using other four-letter-words.
“Love” is about avoiding the most damaging one letter word: “I”. While today the world seems to be centred around the “I” and “me” of many persons who would like to find themselves placed on the first and highest step. Wanting to be the most important has been from long time. That is nothing new and Jesus also had to give some lessons about pride and knowing their place, to the apostles. God also had to learn Jonah that he should have not to think so much about himself nor on what he would think the most appropriate.
Jesus had a lot of work to let the people understand that they had to kill the most poisonous three-letter word: “Ego” and should try to replace it with the better two-letter-word: “we”. He warned his listeners that they should be “eager” to “learn” and “humble” enough to present themselves to the world and to God in all “honesty”. He encountered also many people who looked at the popularity and power Jesus got and tried to let them understand their questioning and false attitude of doing like they wanted to know more was fed by the most nefarious eight-letter word: “Jealousy” of which any person should “distance” this, to be able to “acquire” the most powerful nine-letter word: “Knowledge” and to get some more “Wisdom” (the Five-letter-word to go for).
Only by having love for the environment, plants, animals and people around them, would humans be able to grow in their love and be able to feel themselves save (a necessary four-letter-word), building up the five-letter-word “Trust” to double it to the most essential ten-letter word: “Confidence”.
Jesus asked about his reasons why he talked to a sinning women who had to stoned wrote in sand, whit the love when someone hurts us we should write it down in sand where winds of forgiveness can erase it away.
The Ghost who has the most powerful Love had given everything to His Creation and is still willing to give so much we would not be able to carry it all. He also gave His only begotten son who He dearly loved and came here on earth to preach this undeserved Love. He showed us how we also got to come to this powerful force in life which can be made able to grow by the greatest asset: Faith.
But today most people do not see the “Opening Balance!” they got at birth, and look only to see their bank-account filled with as much as possible. Because of the wrongly placed love they do not see that the “Heart” is our “Current Asset” and our “Soul” our “Fixed Asset“. Their thinking got disfigured, though the “Brain” is our “Fixed Deposit”.
They should get to see that Knowledge is our Investment and Love is our Dividend.
Lots of people lost respect to others and therefore lost also respect for themselves falling in the trap of the ugliest personality trait: “selfishness”. Others have become competitors. They are looked at as rivalries. this world has learned that everybody has to compete with each other, instead of helping each other to grow together and to reach the same goal.
In the attitude of men we can see the big difference between humans and God. One of the basic differences between God and humans is, God gives, gives and forgives. But the human gets, gets, gets and forgets….& still not Happy (again a five-letter word to be desired)? It is desirable that we would all wish each-other happiness.
But today it looks like nobody likes it that others have more happiness than them. Lots of people hate it when others can have “more” (a four-letter word we should not place in the wrong context). Resentment, spite or even rancour are growing diseases, which make people not satisfied with themselves and with those around them. They think that when the can be brutal that they shall mean something more. Vile words and savage actions have to bring them some standing. But the appearance or prestige may not always be what they had in ambition.
Not many keep any curses that they want to say within the inner dialogue in their head. Lots of people do not see any harm or do not condone cursing. Often we hear children shouting ” I want”, “I don’t”, “I can’t” and then we can wonder if they have learned to love to aim for and to look for what is behind and beyond. then we hear their parents use four-letter-words which sometimes gets us to get red ears but do not anything to those rolling and crying kids on the flour in the supermarket.
We can notice that The Y generation got in conflict with itself and that we should consider more the Vile language and behaviour plus little secrets. The world should get to know that there are Alternative four letter words which are much, much better to use more frequently than all the popular words which sometimes have become meaningless or not adding anything to the phrase. So why using those ugly words when they do not ad anything positive to the thought?
Some years ago it was very popular to take Gods name in vain. But today nobody looks strange when somebody uses the title of God to underline his negative thoughts. Also the name of Jesus Christ is often been used in vain, but that has also just become a nothing saying few words. “hell” and “dam” do not seem to mean anything nowadays. But is it really so that nobody feels hurt any more when somebody say “damn you”. Though he perhaps may not want the person to be really be damned. Because a lot of people do not believe in eternal punishment the curse or swear at them does not do anything. But surely such an interjection expressing annoyance, disgust or impatience, shows that no value is given to the other one and that there is not much place for any sort of love or kindness.
To utter imprecations, or to call down evil on somebody can’t be called an act of love.
Swear-words may perhaps not be considered bad language, but we should all be aware that it should not be appropriate to use such language.
In case we love somebody we do not use bad words against him or her. And we should take in mind that the Word of God tells us:
“And you shall love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Mitsrayim. ” (Deuteronomy 10:19 The Scriptures 1998+)
“‘Do not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the children of your people. And you shall love your neighbour as yourself. I am יהוה {Jehovah}. ” (Leviticus 19:18 The Scriptures 1998+)
“to love יהוה {Jehovah} your Elohim, to obey His voice, and to cling to Him – for He is your life and the length of your days – to dwell in the land which יהוה {Jehovah} swore to your fathers, to Abto Yitshand to Yato give them.” (Deuteronomy 30:20 The Scriptures 1998+) means we should follow up the words of God to treat others with respect and not to use bad or wrong words against them.
“Then she said to him, “How do you say, ‘I love you,’ when your heart is not with me? You have mocked me these three times, and have not made known to me where your great strength lies.” ” (Judges 16:15 The Scriptures 1998+)
We should remember: “by loving those who hate you, and by hating those who love you. For you have made it clear today that you have neither commanders nor servants, for today I know that if Abhad lived and all of us had died today, then it would be right in your eyes. ” (2 Samuel 19:6 The Scriptures 1998+)
“Owe no one any matter except to love one another, for he who loves another has filled the Torah. For this, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not bear false witness,” “You shall not covet,” and if there is any other command, is summed up in this word, “You shall love your neighbour as yourself.” Love does no evil to a neighbour. Therefore, love is completion of the Torah. ” (Romans 13:8-10 The Scriptures 1998+)
“Therefore, as chosen ones of Elohim, set-apart and beloved, put on compassion, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, patience, bearing with one another, and forgiving each other if anyone has a complaint against another, indeed, as Messiah forgave you so also should you. But above all these put on love, which is a bond of the perfection. ” (Colossians 3:12-14 The Scriptures 1998+)
“And above all have fervent love for one another, because love covers a great number of sins. ” (1 Peter 4:8 The Scriptures 1998+)
Many people use not appropriate more-letter-words because they are afraid they would not be counted for their sayings. they want to use fortifying language because they are afraid they shall not be taken into account for what they have to say. In love is no fear, so in case they would accept the others and love them, they should not fear their words would not have the bearing which they deserve. Impulses have their origin in ourselves and shall show to others how we are inside. As a Christian we should have the right heart and the right attitude to honour Christ and His Father. We should work on ourselves to make us perfect in love. Putting away the wrong more-letterwords is on action we do have to undertake as soon as we want to follow Christ Jesus. In him we should become more perfect in love.
“There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear, because fear holds punishment, and he who fears has not been made perfect in love. ” (1 John 4:18 The Scriptures 1998+)
We may love whatever gives us pleasure and delight, whether animal or intellectual; and if our hearts are right, we love God above all things, as the sum of all excellence and all the attributes which can communicate happiness to intelligent beings. In other words, the Christian loves God with the love of complacency in his attributes, the love of benevolence towards the interest of his kingdom, and the love of gratitude for favours received. Opposed to hatred our words and actions should show an affection of the mind excited by beauty and worth of any kind, or by the qualities of an object which communicate pleasure, sensual or intellectual. Foul language does not fit into that picture.
+
Read also:
- Vile language and behaviour plus little secrets
- The Y generation in conflict with itself
- Alternative four letter words
- I wanted to follow you but, uh, no.
- People don’t hunt out “loopholes” when they are seeking to love God and neighbours
- When we love we do not need laws
+++
Related articles
- Mompiphany #33: Stop, Can’t and Don’t Are 4 Letter Words (mompiphany.com)
When they are not overusing the word mom, my kids are overusing other words, namely 4 letter words. - Trust & Sorry – Those Five Letter Words… (clearhaven.wordpress.com)
Sorry is more than just a word. Because how can just a simple word serve as a healing balm, a soothing essence for pain. You can’t even see it, yet the mere utterance of the word has the power to set everything aright.
+
My analogy of trust may seem cheesy, but here’s the idea: the person who keeps wobbling your egg is the one who’s playing with your emotions. The one who knows he/she is the only one you can count on, and can say sorry and get away with it if anything happens to your egg. - That 4 letter word. (lafeminafantastique.wordpress.com)
a 4 letter word which we all love to avoid because of that fear… of failure… of confrontation… of rejection…of the truth. We all do have some form of fear whether it is just one or several.
+
we fail to attempt to even try and by giving in to our fear often complete and total happiness is missed. Too often do we throw in the towel because we fear consequences and pre-meditated outcomes, failure failure failure is a huge fear of many, rejection rejection rejection is another. But if we live in fear all of our lives do we ever live fully? Can true happiness be totally achieved? - A Four Letter Word. (meenas17.wordpress.com)
She keeps silent / She has become an illiterate. / She expresses a wry smile. / She makes no noise. - Ten Principles of Life (harikrishnamurthy.wordpress.com)
The following are the ten Pinciples of Philosophy for this society. - Love isn’t just a four letter word (ask.metafilter.com)
A male married friend recently told me he loved me. A few weeks later he told me again
+
He and I have become closer friends lately, and I believe there is some mutual attraction. I’m OK with that – I fall in the camp of “It’s OK to be a little flirty and have crushes sometimes but I would never consider cheating on my boyfriend,” but I wonder if saying “I love you,” like this is crossing a boundary. - How do I process – I never tried to hurt you but I’m sorry if it happened, it wasn’t my intent, it was yours, get out of my life forever? (ask.metafilter.com)
If you hurt someone with what you perceive to be their and your best interests in mind, while simultaneously knowing that what you are doing will hurt that person, is it any different than actively trying to hurt the person. Does duration and occurrence play a role? If I don’t mean to hurt you, but know I am and will for 4 years is it less bad than a single act of active hurtfulness? Is it possible to want to hurt someone you love in an extreme moment but still love and care for that person? Is it possible to call that love? - There’s Nothing Like a Man’s Pen (andshelaughs.wordpress.com)
What is it about the written word, on real paper, penned by the hand of someone dear that still holds us spellbound? Perhaps just that. Instead of digital flashes passing through space, the energy of the person is much more palpable, near and tactile when we hold the paper that they held, when we hold the envelope that they sealed or when we smudge the ink that they penned. A printed page is ever so much more cuddly and ready when you can’t sleep and want to re-read a love letter or giggly note from a gal-pal.
+
Today the reaction is often instant. You know they got the digital message almost as soon as you hit send. In the good old days of snail mail, there was the agony and ecstasy of hope, dread, and wonderful expectation. Now we experience those emotions in a nano-second. I prefer a well thought-out hand-written letter for the good stuff, as do the other gentle ladies out there. - On Love: What I learned (teejowee.com)
There are several kinds of love. One is a selfish, mean, grasping, egotistical thing which uses love for self-importance. This is the ugly and crippling kind. The other is an outpouring of everything good in you — of kindness and consideration and respect — not only the social respect of manners but the greater respect which is recognition of another person as unique and valuable. The first kind can make you sick and small and weak but the second can release in you strength, and courage and goodness and even wisdom you didn’t know you had. - An Open Letter to my Daughter (justiceforwomenindia.wordpress.com)
I feel it is my duty to write this to you to prepare you for the life that you might or might not have to fight for. - A Letter from a Mother to a Daughter (momentumofjoy.com)
If when we talk, I repeat the same thing a thousand times, don’t interrupt to say: “You said the same thing a minute ago”… Just listen, please. - The Power of Love Includes Stress Relief (everydayhealth.com)
Love does wonderful things for your state of mind, and it also offers natural stress relief. In healthy relationships, the power of love is strong enough to keep your heart happy and your mind and body healthy. - Thought For The Day: Charity (harikrishnamurthy.wordpress.com)
True charity brings prosperity to the donor. “The way to receive is to give”. Sacrifice is a synonym for success.
+
Learn this wonderful lesson from nature. Give away, sacrifice, renounce everything and you become white, pure and perfect. Take in, aggrandize, and accumulate you become black, impure and imperfect. This is the law. -
Balance Sheet of our life (harikrishnamurthy.wordpress.com)
Some very Good and Very bad things - You Are My Everything+ True Friend (harikrishnamurthy.wordpress.com)
Pas une Trinité mais un seul Dieu
Icône dite de la Trinité d’Andrei Roublev. Il s’agit des trois hommes apparus à Abraham au Chêne de Mambré Gn 18 que Roublev, à la suite des Pères de l’Église, interprète comme une figure du mystère de la Trinité indivisible.
Il y a une théologie chrétienne qui a développé la conception d’un Dieu trinitaire : un Dieu unique en trois aspects (hypostases) : le Père, le Fils (La Parole) et le Saint-Esprit, égaux, participant d’une même essence (consubstantialité ou homoousia) et pourtant fondamentalement distincts.
Refuser ou négliger de «connaître Dieu», c’est risquer le jugement, mais il y en a beaucoup dés gens qui ne pense pas trop à Dieu, le Père et le fils. La plupart de nos contemporains, même de ceux qui se disent chrétiens, affichent une indifférence extraordinaire pour le sujet de la Trinité. Ils croient assez vaguement au dogme de la « trinité », selon lequel Dieu est trois personnes — Dieu le Père, Dieu le Fils et Dieu le Saint-Esprit — et en même temps une seule. Ce dogme veut que le Fils ait préexisté au ciel avant sa naissance de la vierge Marie, qu’il y ait même une identité absolue d’espèce et de durée entre Dieu le Père et Christ le Fils; qu’il y ait non seulement égalité de durée mais aussi de puissance entre ces trois personnes.
Mais la Bible garde un silence absolu sur ce dogme compliqué. Le mot « trinité » ne s’y rencontre point, ni les principes du dogme non plus. Il faut dire même que l’enseignement de la Bible à propos de Dieu, de Jésus-Christ et du Saint-Esprit paraît être tout à fait contraire aux idées « trinitaires ». Si les principes de ce dogme sont vrais, et indispensables même pour le salut, comme l’affirment la plupart des églises orthodoxes, n’est-il pas incroyable que la Bible non seulement les laisse douteux, sans les préciser en aucune façon, mais qu’elle enseigne même des principes contraires?
***
L’ apôtre Paul a précisé : “ Pour nous il y a réellement un seul Dieu le Père ” et “ il y a un seul Seigneur, Jésus Christ ”. (1 Corinthiens 8:5, 6).
Le mot ‘dieu’ étais appliqué à des hommes avec une position hautes, comme aux anges et aussi des juges et bien sur il concerne aussi Jésus. Alors on a le mot dieu qui peu s’applique aussi bien a des humains qu’a des êtres spirituels. Le mot ‘dieu’ n’est qu’un titre tout comme Seigneur. Satan est aussi appeler dieu est aussi un majucule selon la bible Martin.
Aussi le mot ‘Èlohim’ est appliqué à Jéhovah, le vrai Dieu, mais aussi à de faux dieux, tels le dieu philistin Dagôn (Jg 16:23, 24 ; 1S 5:7) et le dieu assyrien Nisrok (2R 19:37). Un Hébreu ne pouvait manifestement se contenter de dire à un Philistin ou à un Assyrien qu’il adorait “ Dieu [Èlohim] ” pour identifier le Personnage à qui allait son culte.
Le nom du Dieu d’Israël et de Juda apparaît plus de 7 000 fois dans la Bible hébraïque sous la forme du Tétragramme יהוה, c’est-à-dire YHWH = Jéhovah. Ce nom est aussi attesté, sous une forme incomplète (Jah), dans un grand nombre d’anthroponymes. Il provient de la racine hébraïque HWH/HYH, verbe qui signifie « être » ou “devenir”. (la Tob a des préjugés contre le nom de Dieu la preuve le tétragramme n’apparaît pas dans cette version. Le nom de Dieu {Jéhovah}, Yahweh ou Yahwoh n’apparait que dans les notes marginales)
Èlohim ou Élohim (hébreu ‘elohim) ou Éloïm (hébreu ‘elohim) Pluriel de ‘éloha, qui signifie « Dieu ».
On trouve ce mot dans la Bible et aussi dans les textes babyloniens d’Amarna.
Dans ses articles consacrés à Jéhovah, The Imperial Bible-Dictionary illustre éloquemment la différence entre ʼÈlohim (Dieu) et Jéhovah. On y lit concernant le nom Jéhovah :
“ Il s’agit partout d’un nom propre, qui désigne le Dieu personnel et lui seul ; tandis qu’Èlohim tient plus du nom commun, désignant habituellement, il est vrai, le Suprême, mais pas nécessairement ni uniformément. [...] Un Hébreu parlera peut-être du Èlohim, du vrai Dieu, par opposition avec tous les faux dieux ; mais il ne parlera jamais du Jéhovah, car Jéhovah est le nom du vrai Dieu uniquement. Il dira fréquemment mon Dieu [...] ; mais jamais mon Jéhovah, car quand il dit mon Dieu il veut dire Jéhovah. Il parlera du Dieu d’Israël, mais jamais du Jéhovah d’Israël, car il n’y a pas d’autre Jéhovah. Il parlera du Dieu vivant, mais jamais du Jéhovah vivant, car il ne peut concevoir Jéhovah autrement que vivant. ”
— Par P. Fairbairn, Londres, 1874, vol. I, p. 856 ; voir aussi Dictionnaire de la Bible, par F. Vigouroux, Paris, 1912, tome deuxième, deuxième partie, col. 1702.
Cela est vrai également du terme grec signifiant Dieu, Théos. Il était attribué indifféremment au vrai Dieu et à des dieux païens comme Zeus et Hermès (Jupiter et Mercure chez les Romains) (voir Ac 14:11-15). Les paroles de Paul en 1 Corinthiens 8:4-6 établissent la réalité : “ Car, bien qu’il y ait ceux qu’on appelle ‘ dieux ’, soit au ciel, soit sur la terre, tout comme il y a beaucoup de ‘ dieux ’ et beaucoup de ‘ seigneurs ’, pour nous il y a réellement un seul Dieu le Père, de qui toutes choses sont, et nous pour lui. ” La croyance en de nombreux dieux, qui impose de distinguer le vrai Dieu des autres, s’est perpétuée jusqu’au XXe siècle.
“Pour ce qui regarde donc de manger des choses sacrifiées aux idoles, nous savons que l’idole n’est rien au monde, et qu’il n’y a aucun autre Dieu qu’un seul ; Car encore qu’il y en ait qui soient appelés dieux, soit au ciel, soit en la terre (comme il y a plusieurs dieux, et plusieurs Seigneurs,) Nous n’avons pourtant qu’un seul Dieu, {qui est} le Père ; duquel {sont} toutes choses, et nous en lui ; et un seul Seigneur Jésus-Christ, par lequel {sont} toutes choses, et nous par lui.” (1 Corinthiens 8:4-6 Mar)
“Et les gens qui étaient là assemblés, ayant vu ce que Paul avait fait, élevèrent leur voix, disant en Langue Lycaonienne : les dieux s’étant faits semblables aux hommes, sont descendus vers nous. Et ils appelaient Barnabas Jupiter, et Paul Mercure, parce que c’était lui qui portait la parole. Et même le Sacrificateur de Jupiter, qui était devant leur ville, ayant amené des taureaux couronnés jusqu’à l’entrée de la porte, voulait leur sacrifier avec la foule. Mais les Apôtres Barnabas et Paul ayant appris cela, ils déchirèrent leurs vêtements et se jetèrent au milieu de la foule, en s’écriant, Et disant : hommes! pourquoi faites-vous ces choses? nous sommes aussi des hommes, sujets aux mêmes passions que vous, et nous vous annonçons que de ces choses vaines vous vous convertissiez au Dieu vivant, qui a fait le ciel et la terre, la mer, et toutes les choses qui y sont.” (Actes 14:11-15 Mar)
“Desquels le Dieu de ce siècle a aveuglé les entendements, {c’est-à-dire}, des incrédules, afin que la lumière de l’Évangile de la gloire de Christ, lequel est l’image de Dieu, ne leur resplendît point.” (2 Corinthiens 4:4 Mar)
Les juifs accusaient Jésus de se faire dieu, c’est à dire parmi les dieux reconnu des juifs. Or Jésus n’était pas reconnu par les juifs étant de “ces dieux là” et voulaient lapider Jésus pour blasphème. Mais Jésus démonte leur raisonnement en leur démontrant que leur loi ne demande pas de prouver qu’un homme fait parti “des dieux” en le prouvant par les œuvres, puisque les juifs accusaient Jésus de faire des œuvres en ce sens. Or Jésus atteste une nouvelle foi qu’il fait ses œuvres au nom de son père qui est Dieu pas aux nom “des dieux”. Ainsi Jésus démontre que même si les juifs ne croient pas aux œuvres de Jésus pour prouver qu’il est le fils de Dieu, il sont bien obligé de croire que les œuvres que Jésus a fait prouve qu’il ne vient pas “des dieux”, et s’il ne vient pas “des dieux” les juifs sont donc obligés de constater que Jésus vient de Dieu.
“Jésus leur répondit : n’est-il pas écrit en votre Loi : j’ai dit : vous êtes des dieux ; Si elle a {donc} appelé dieux ceux à qui la parole de Dieu est adressée ; et {cependant} l’Ecriture ne peut être anéantie ; Dites-vous que je blasphème, moi que le Père a sanctifié, et qu’il a envoyé au monde, parce que j’ai dit : je suis le Fils de Dieu ? Si je ne fais pas les œuvres de mon Père, ne me croyez point. Mais si je les fais, et que vous ne vouliez pas me croire, croyez à ces œuvres ; afin que vous connaissiez et que vous croyiez que le Père est en moi, et moi en lui.” (Jean 10:34-38 Mar)
“Siméon Pierre, serviteur et Apôtre de Jésus-Christ, à vous qui avez obtenu une foi de pareil prix avec nous, par la justice de notre Dieu et Sauveur Jésus-Christ.” (2 Pierre 1:1 Mar)
On trouve les dieux des gens, comme Elvis, Maradonna et autres, mais aussi Jésus et le plus grands des dieux, le seul souvereign: Dieu des dieux: YHWH: Jehovah.
Cette Grand Dieu des dieux est esprit, qui est le vrais Dieu et Créateur.
Le vrai Dieu n’est pas un Dieu anonyme ; son nom est Jéhovah (Dt 6:4 ; Ps 83:18). Il est Dieu du fait qu’il est le Créateur (Gn 1:1 ; Ré 4:11). Le vrai Dieu est bien réel et ce n’est pas lui qui est venu, mais Lui qui à envoyer son fils (Jn 7:28) ; c’est une personne (Ac 3:19 ; Hé 9:24) et non une loi naturelle inerte opérant sans législateur vivant, ni une force aveugle fonctionnant par une succession de hasards pour produire une chose ou une autre.
Il y a un seul Dieu; “la trinité” est de paganisme et adoptée dans “l’église”. L’ Israël était unique entre les nations. Tandis que les gens d’eux avaient une multiplicité de dieux, l’ Israël a été ordonné:
“ Écoute, ô Israël ! Jéhovah notre Dieu est un seul Jéhovah.
Tu dois aimer Jéhovah ton Dieu de tout ton cœur, et de toute ton âme, et de toute ta force vitale.
Ces paroles que je t’ordonne aujourd’hui devront être sur ton cœur ;
il faudra que tu les inculques à ton fils et que tu en parles quand tu seras assis dans ta maison et quand tu marcheras sur la route, quand tu te coucheras et quand tu te lèveras.Tu devras les attacher comme un signe sur ta main, et elles devront servir de fronteau entre tes yeux ; tu devras les écrire sur les montants de porte de ta maison et sur tes portes.” (Deutéronome 6: 4-9 Les Saintes Écritures — Traduction du monde nouveau)
Dieu a témoigné aussi- ““Je suis l’Eternel, et il n’y en a point d’autre ; il n’y a point de Dieu que moi. Je t’ai ceint, quoique tu ne me connusses point.” (Esaïe 45:5 Mar)
Sauf Elohim Hashem Jehovah il n’y a aucun dieu.
“pour qu’on sache que toi, dont le nom est Jéhovah, tu es, toi seul, le Très-Haut sur toute la terre !” (Psaumes 83:18 MN)
“ Tu es digne, Jéhovah, oui notre Dieu, de recevoir la gloire et l’honneur et la puissance, parce que tu as créé toutes choses, et à cause de ta volonté elles ont existé et ont été créées. ” (Révélation 4:11 MN)
Une citation significative par Jésus Christ montre il ne s’est pas considéré comme la partie d’ “une trinité”. Il a cité Deutéronome 6v4 (au-dessus):
“Et quelqu’un des Scribes qui les avait ouïs disputer, voyant qu’il leur avait bien répondu, s’approcha de lui, et lui demanda : quel est le premier de tous les Commandements ? Et Jésus lui répondit : le premier de tous les Commandements est : écoute Israël, le Seigneur notre Dieu est le seul Seigneur ; Et tu aimeras le Seigneur ton Dieu de tout ton cœur, de toute ton âme, de toute ta pensée, et de toute ta force. C’est là le premier Commandement. Et le second, qui est semblable au premier, est celui-ci : tu aimeras ton prochain comme toi-même. Il n’y a point d’autre Commandement plus grand que ceux-ci. Et le Scribe lui dit : Maître, tu as bien dit selon la vérité, qu’il y a un seul Dieu, et qu’il n’y en a point d’autre que lui ; Et que de l’aimer de tout son cœur, de toute son intelligence, de toute son âme, et de toute sa force ; et d’aimer son prochain comme soi-même, c’est plus que tous les holocaustes et les sacrifices. Et Jésus voyant que {ce Scribe} avait répondu prudemment, lui dit : tu n’es pas loin du Royaume de Dieu. Et personne n’osait plus l’interroger.” (Marc 12:28-34 Mar)
Jésus ne dis pas que lui est Dieu, mais que le Seigneur le plus haut Jéhovah, notre Dieu, est l’unique Seigneur notre Dieu qui est unique, et qu’il n’y en a point d’autre que lui.
Nous pourrions demander, à propos de ce scribe, recommandé par Christ pour sa compréhension, a fait il croit en un Dieu seul, ou “une trinité”?
Également, le Juif Jésus a témoigné que sont Père est PLUS GRAND QUE lui et qu’il pouvait rein faire sans Lui.
“Vous avez entendu que je vous ai dit : je m’en vais, et je reviens à vous ; si vous m’aimiez, vous seriez certes joyeux de ce que j’ai dit : je m’en vais au Père : car le Père est plus grand que moi.” (Jean 14:28 Mar)
“Et comme il sortait pour se mettre en chemin, un homme accourut, et se mit à genoux devant lui, et lui fit cette demande : Maître qui es bon, que ferai-je pour hériter la vie éternelle ? Et Jésus lui répondit : pourquoi m’appelles-tu bon ? il n’y a nul être qui soit bon que Dieu.” (Marc 10:17-18 Mar)
“ Repentez-vous donc et retournez-vous, pour que vos péchés soient effacés, afin que des époques de rafraîchissement viennent d’ auprès de la personne de Jéhovah et qu’il envoie le Christ qui vous est destiné, Jésus, que le ciel, oui, doit garder jusqu’aux temps du rétablissement de toutes choses dont Dieu a parlé par la bouche de ses saints prophètes des temps anciens. Moïse ou Moussa en effet a dit : ‘ Jéhovah Dieu vous suscitera d’entre vos frères un prophète comme moi. Vous devrez l’écouter selon toutes les choses qu’il vous dira. Oui, toute âme qui n’écoutera pas ce Prophète sera complètement détruite du milieu du peuple. ’ Tous les prophètes, en effet, depuis Samuel et ceux qui ont suivi, tous ceux qui ont parlé, ont aussi annoncé clairement ces jours-là. Vous êtes les fils des prophètes et de l’alliance que Dieu a contractée avec vos ancêtres, en disant à Abraham : ‘ Et en ta semence seront bénies toutes les familles de la terre. ’ C’est à vous d’abord que Dieu, après avoir suscité son Serviteur, l’a envoyé pour vous bénir en détournant chacun [de vous] de ses actions méchantes. ”” (Actes 3:19-26 MN)
” Car Christ est entré, non pas dans un lieu saint fait par des mains, qui est une copie de la réalité, mais dans le ciel même, pour paraître maintenant pour nous devant la personne de Dieu. Ce n’est pas non plus afin qu’il s’offre lui-même souvent, comme le grand prêtre en effet entre dans le lieu saint d’année en année avec du sang qui n’est pas le sien.” (Hébreux 9:24-25 MN)
” “ Tu ne dois pas prendre le nom de Jéhovah ton Dieu de manière indigne, car Jéhovah ne laissera pas impuni celui qui prendra son nom de manière indigne.” (Exode 20:7 MN)
“ Dieu parla encore à Moïse et lui dit : “ Je suis Jéhovah. J’apparaissais à Abraham, à Isaac et à Jacob comme Dieu Tout-Puissant, mais en ce qui concerne mon nom de Jéhovah, je ne me suis pas fait connaître d’eux. J’ai aussi établi mon alliance avec eux pour leur donner le pays de Canaan, le pays de leurs résidences en terre étrangère, dans lequel ils ont résidé comme étrangers. J’ai moi-même entendu le gémissement des fils d’Israël que les Égyptiens réduisent en esclavage, et je me souviens de mon alliance. “ C’est pourquoi dis aux fils d’Israël : ‘ Je suis Jéhovah, et je vous ferai vraiment sortir de dessous les fardeaux des Égyptiens et je vous délivrerai de leur esclavage ; oui, je vous revendiquerai à bras tendu et par de grands jugements. Oui, je vous prendrai pour moi comme peuple et je serai Dieu pour vous ; et vraiment vous saurez que je suis Jéhovah votre Dieu, qui vous fais sortir de dessous les fardeaux d’Égypte. Oui, je vous ferai entrer dans le pays au sujet duquel j’ai levé ma main en faisant serment de le donner à Abraham, à Isaac et à Jacob ; et vraiment je vous le donnerai comme une chose à posséder. Je suis Jéhovah. ’ ””(Exode 6:2-8 MN)
Où fait l’idée de “la trinité” de la “co-égalité” correspond à? La “trinité” de terme n’apparaît pas dans la Bible, mais le concept calcule bien en vue dans les sources païennes,tel que dans Babylone ancienne et sa religion de “mystère”. L’ “église” de apostat est appelée “un mystère: Babylone la grande” (Apocalypse 17v5) et les “ministres” sont sus pour parler de “la trinité” comme un “mystère”. Cette abomination a été finalement définie après des siècles d’argument dans AD381-451.
‘Babylone’ signifie la ‘confusion’, cp Genèse 11v9.
Telles choses ont été prophétisées - Actes 20v28-32,
2 Timothée 4v1-4; Jude – cp 1 Corinthiens 1v17-31.
“Et il y avait sur son front un nom écrit, mystère, la grande Babylone, la mère des impudicités et des abominations de la terre.” (Apocalypse 17:5 Mar)
Le procédé de déclinaison est hors tracé dans ’départ’ (seulement en anglais à l’heure actuelle – lien à ‘departure’).
L’enseignement de “la trinité” exige que ce Jésus Christ s’est dépouillé de sa nature divine et était né sur la terre, et maintenant il a supposé encore l’égalité avec le Père.
Bien, le Paul d’apôtre, qui a écrit par l’esprit de Dieu, et était un vaisseau choisi par Christ se, a témoigné que l’au-dessus proposition est fausse. Il a écrit, long après Jésus est monté au ciel:
“Car il y a un seul Dieu, et un seul Médiateur entre Dieu et les hommes, {savoir} Jésus-Christ homme ;” (1 Timothée 2:5 Mar)
Notez bien l’au-dessus. Oui, Jésus Christ est toujours un homme, cependant, pas mortel , mais immortel. Il a maintenant un corps immortel, lequel est aussi l’espoir de ses disciples aujourd’hui:
“Lequel vint de nuit à Jésus, et lui dit : Maître, nous savons que tu es un Docteur venu de Dieu : car personne ne peut faire les miracles que tu fais, si Dieu n’est avec lui.” (Jean 3:2 Mar)
Las apôtres savent que ils serons comme lui, mais ça ne veut pas dire qu’il venait dieu, ou comme Dieu, parce que c’est COMME LUI: le Jésus.
Même à la fin de l’Age de Royaume de 1000 années sur la terre, quand la gloire et pouvoir de Christ sera à son zénith, il fera toujours n’ EST pas ÉGALER À DIEU.
Jésus ne prends pas soit même, mais remettra le royaume à celui qui est Dieu et Père, après avoir détruit toute domination, toute autorité et toute puissance.
“Et après viendra la fin, quand il aura remis le Royaume à Dieu le Père, et quand il aura aboli tout empire, et toute puissance, et toute force. Car il faut qu’il règne jusqu’à ce qu’il ait mis tous ses ennemis sous ses pieds. L’ennemi qui sera détruit le dernier, c’est la mort. Car {Dieu} a assujetti toutes choses sous ses pieds ; or quand il est dit que toutes choses lui sont assujetties, il est évident que celui qui lui a assujetti toutes choses est excepté. Et après que toutes choses lui auront été assujetties, alors aussi le Fils lui-même sera assujetti à celui qui lui a assujetti toutes choses ; afin que Dieu soit tout en tous.” (1 Corinthiens 15:24-28 Mar)
Alors après Jésus, celui qui lui a soumis toutes choses est excepté. Et lorsque toutes choses lui auront été soumises, ALORS LE FILS LUI-MÊME SERA SOUMIS À CELUI QUI LUI A SOUMIS TOUTES CHOSES, A FIN QUE DIEU SOIT TOUT EN TOUS” -
Si comment important est-ce que ce sujet est?
C’est trais important de savoir les positions de toutes les figures, le Créateur, Dieu le Père, le fils de Dieu (pas dieu le fils), Jésus Christ, les dieux des hommes et savoir le seul Vrai Dieu: Jehovah.
Jésus Christ nous dit: “Et c’est ici la vie éternelle, qu’ils te connaissent seul vrai Dieu, et celui que tu as envoyé, Jésus-Christ.” (Jean 17:3 Mar)
Nous pouvant êtres sauvé.
“Car l’Écriture dit : “ Quiconque met sa foi en lui ne sera pas déçu. ” Il n’y a pas en effet de distinction entre Juif et Grec, car il y a le même Seigneur au-dessus de tous, qui est riche pour tous ceux qui l’invoquent. Car “ tout homme qui invoquera le nom de Jéhovah sera sauvé ”. Cependant, comment invoqueront-ils celui en qui ils n’ont pas foi ? Et comment auront-ils foi en celui dont ils n’ont pas entendu parler ? Et comment entendront-ils sans quelqu’un qui prêche ? Et comment prêcheront-ils, à moins qu’ils n’aient été envoyés ? Comme c’est écrit : “ Qu’ils sont jolis les pieds de ceux qui annoncent des bonnes nouvelles de choses bonnes ! ”
Toutefois, tous n’ont pas obéi à la bonne nouvelle. Isaïe dit en effet : “ Jéhovah, qui a ajouté foi à ce qu’il a entendu de nous ? ” Ainsi la foi naît de ce qu’on a entendu. Et ce qu’on a entendu vient par la parole concernant Christ. Toutefois je demande : Ils ont bien entendu, n’est-ce pas ? Mais voyons ! “ par toute la terre est sorti le bruit qu’ils font, et jusqu’aux extrémités de la terre habitée leurs discours ”. Toutefois je demande : Israël l’a bien su, n’est-ce pas ? Tout d’abord Moïse dit : “ J’exciterai votre jalousie par ce qui n’est pas une nation ; j’exciterai votre fureur par une nation stupide. ” Mais Isaïe s’enhardit jusqu’à dire : “ J’ai été trouvé par ceux qui ne me cherchaient pas ; je me suis manifesté à ceux qui ne me demandaient pas. ” Mais au sujet d’Israël il dit : “ Tout au long du jour j’ai étendu mes mains vers un peuple qui est désobéissant et qui réplique. ” (Romains 10:11-21 MN)
Dieu est caractérisé par l’amour, celui pour toutes ses créatures. Dieu aurait pu se contenter d’exister et de ne jamais rien crée mais par amour Il a crée.
Il aurait pu créer des êtres serviles, incapables de désobéir et/ou des être sans émotion et sans sensibilité mais au contraire, par amour Il nous a donné la capacité de nous réjouir, d’aimer, de goûter la vie de mille façons différentes et Il nous a donné un libre arbitre total. L’homme n’est pas guidé par des instincts mais peut faire des choix par lui même.
De plus, par amour pour les humains, après la rébellion d’Adam et Ève, Il les a laissé avoir des enfants alors qu’Il aurait pu les détruire. L’amour de Dieu pour l’humanité implique justement qu’Il intervienne pour éviter que l’humanité n’en vienne à totalement se détruire. Dieu a le pouvoir de pardonner et de donner la vie vraie. Par amour pour les humains Il a prévu une rançon pour notre péché héréditaire en laissant son fils venir sur terre, souffrir et mourir pour nous. Enfin, par amour, Dieu a laissé du temps pour que les humains aient pleinement conscience de leurs erreurs et se tournent vers Lui. Dieu a montré Son amour pour les humains en nous préservant à travers notre ancêtre Noé et que dans le cas de Sodome, de même, Il a montré Sa justice en évitant à Lot et sa famille de périr avec les méchants.
Jésus montre clairement en quoi Dieu est bon aussi bien avec les bons qu’avec les méchants : tous les humains bénéficient de la création de Dieu et Dieu aime tous les humains et comme dit Paul : mais il use de patience envers nous, ne voulant point qu’aucun périsse, mais que tous viennent à la repentance. (2 Pierre 3:9) Bible de l’épée. Car Dieu est amour mais Il est aussi sagesse, puissance et justice et Jésus a clairement parlé d’un jugement que ce soit avec ses apôtres pendant son ministère ou dans la vision donnée à Jean.
Comme un père pour ses enfants, nous sommes appelés à être fils de Dieu.
“Le Seigneur ne retarde point {l’exécution de} sa promesse, comme quelques-uns estiment qu’il y ait du retardement, mais il est patient envers nous, ne voulant point qu’aucun périsse, mais que tous se repentent.” (2 Pierre 3:9 Mar)
TOUTES les personnes ayant une bonne connaissance des saintes Écritures savent que Dieu a un nom personnel. Il est vrai que dans la Bible le Créateur est aussi désigné par des titres, tels que “Dieu”, “Seigneur”, “Père”, “Tout-Puissant”, Très-Haut”, etc.. Mais seul son nom personnel et unique résume parfaitement sa personnalité et ses attributs. Dieu dit: “Je suis Jéhovah. C’est là mon nom; et je ne donnerai ma gloire à aucun autre ni ma louange aux images taillées.” (Isaïe 42:8; Ps 83:19)
“Car encore qu’il y en ait qui soient appelés dieux, soit au ciel, soit en la terre (comme il y a plusieurs dieux, et plusieurs Seigneurs,) Nous n’avons pourtant qu’un seul Dieu, {qui est} le Père ; duquel {sont} toutes choses, et nous en lui ; et un seul Seigneur Jésus-Christ, par lequel {sont} toutes choses, et nous par lui.” (1 Corinthiens 8:5-6 Mar)
““ C’est pourquoi dis à la maison d’Israël : ‘ Voici ce qu’a dit le Souverain Seigneur Jéhovah : “ Ce n’est pas à cause de vous que je [le] fais, ô maison d’Israël, mais c’est pour mon saint nom que vous avez profané parmi les nations où vous êtes venus. ” ’ ‘ À coup sûr, je sanctifierai mon grand nom, qui était profané parmi les nations — que vous avez profané au milieu d’elles ; et il faudra que les nations sachent que je suis Jéhovah ’, c’est là ce que déclare le Souverain Seigneur Jéhovah, ‘ quand je serai sanctifié parmi vous sous leurs yeux. Oui, je vous prendrai d’entre les nations, je vous rassemblerai de tous les pays et je vous amènerai sur votre sol. Oui, je ferai sur vous une aspersion d’eau pure, et vous deviendrez purs ; de toutes vos impuretés et de toutes vos sales idoles je vous purifierai. Oui, je vous donnerai un cœur nouveau, et je mettrai au-dedans de vous un esprit nouveau ; oui, j’ôterai de votre chair le cœur de pierre et je vous donnerai un cœur de chair. Je mettrai mon esprit au-dedans de vous, et vraiment j’agirai de telle manière que vous marcherez dans mes prescriptions, que vous garderez et appliquerez réellement mes décisions judiciaires. À coup sûr, vous habiterez dans le pays que j’ai donné à vos ancêtres ; vous devrez devenir mon peuple, et moi je deviendrai votre Dieu. ’” (Ezékiel 36:22-28 MN)
“À coup sûr, je me grandirai {Je me glorifierai} et je me sanctifierai et je me ferai connaître sous les yeux de nations nombreuses {je serai connu}; et il faudra qu’elles sachent que je suis {l’Eternel} Jéhovah. ’ ” (Ezékiel 38:23 )
“Et il leur dit : quand vous prierez, dites : Notre Père qui es aux cieux, ton Nom soit sanctifié. Ton Règne vienne. Ta volonté soit faite en la terre comme au ciel.” (Luc 11:2 Mar)
“il n’y a pour nous qu’un seul Dieu, le Père, de qui tout vient et vers qui nous allons, et un seul Seigneur, Jésus Christ, par qui tout existe et par qui nous sommes.” (1 Corinthiens 8:6 TOB)
“En vérité, en vérité, je vous le dis, un serviteur n’est pas plus grand que son maître, ni un envoyé plus grand que celui qui l’envoie.” (Jean 13:16 TOB)
“Jésus leur dit : « Si Dieu était votre père, vous m’auriez aimé, car c’est de Dieu que je suis sorti et que je viens ; je ne suis pas venu de mon propre chef, c’est Lui qui m’a envoyé.” (Jean 8:42 TOB)
“Et lui s’éloigna d’eux à peu près à la distance d’un jet de pierre ; s’étant mis à genoux, il priait, disant : »Père, si tu veux écarter de moi cette coupe … Pourtant, que ce ne soit pas ma volonté mais la tienne qui se réalise ! »” (Luc 22:41-42 TOB)
“Je veux pourtant que vous sachiez ceci : le chef de tout homme, c’est le Christ ; le chef de la femme, c’est l’homme, le chef du Christ, c’est Dieu.” (1 Corinthiens 11:3 TOB)
“Il leur dit : « Ma coupe, vous la boirez ; quant à siéger à ma droite et à ma gauche, il ne m’appartient pas de l’accorder : ce sera donné à ceux pour qui mon Père l’a préparé. »” (Matthieu 20:23 TOB)
+
Trouvez aussi:
- Dieu de La Bible existe
- Dieu est-II une Trinité
- Essences de Dieu
- Jésus le Roi
- Il y a un seul Dieu – “la trinité” une relique païenne
- Le Dieu de la Bible
- Dieu est-il une Trinité? Comprendre le rapport entre Dieu et Jésus
- Le Père, le Fils, et le Saint-Esprit
- L’esprit saint est le pouvoir de Dieu – ce n’est pas une personne séparée
- La Bible est inspirée et infaillible
- Jésus-Christ est la Bonne Nouvelle
- Philippiens 1 – 2
- Jésus est-il Dieu ?
- Qui est vraiment Jésus Christ ?
- Jésus : ce qu’on a dit de lui
- Que voulait dire Jésus?
- Jésus est le fils de l’homme
- En quel sens Jésus et son Père sont-ils un ?
- Qui est Dieu ? +Qui est Dieu ?
- Jésus a-t-il prononcé le nom divin,YHWH ?
- Qui est Jéhovah selon Révélation 22…
- “ Ceux qu’on appelle ‘ dieux ’ ”
- Les alliances de Dieu
- Dieu, Jéhovah-Dieu, Jaloux, Yahvé ou Jéhovah, quel est Son Nom ?
- Qui est quoi ?
- Apprendre à connaître Dieu : comment ?
- Connaissez-vous Dieu par son nom ?
- Croire en Dieu, est-ce bien raisonnable ?
- Qu’est-ce que l’Esprit Saint ? (Pdf)
- Chronologie de l’antitrinitarisme
- Des Raisons de ne pas Croire aux Doctrines des Trinitaires, au Sujet de la Nature de Dieu et de la Personne de Christ.
- Un peu d’histoire sur le dogme compliqué
- Le Saint-Esprit
- Jésus-Christ, Fils de Dieu
- Examen de passages divers
- La « descente du ciel »
- L’idée de la préexistence de Jésus
+++
Related articles
- Pensée pour ce matin : (jacquesguillard.wordpress.com)
Oublions nos échecs passés, oublions tout ce qui est en arrière. Laissons tout cela, toute notre vie passée. N’oublions pas que nous étions pécheurs et que nos péchés ont été effacés par le sang de Jésus, mais oublions tout ce qui s’est passé hier, dans le passé. Ce qui doit nous intéresser maintenant, c’est ce qui est en avant, le but. Courons vers le but, pour remporter le prix de la vocation céleste de Dieu en Jésus-Christ. - Pensée pour ce matin: (jacquesguillard.wordpress.com)
Si nous gardons un peu de chair dans notre vie, tout le reste finira par être contaminé ! Il faut que ce soit réglé à 100%, une fois pour toutes, pour toujours ! Sinon nous allons traîner un peu de levain dans un coin de notre maison spirituelle, le levain finira par tout faire lever et tout sera contaminé ! - Pensée pour ce matin: (jacquesguillard.wordpress.com)
Acceptons le plan de Dieu, en vue de la joie qui nous est réservée de pouvoir vivre la vie de l’Esprit, de pouvoir vivre le sermon sur la montagne, de pouvoir vivre la perfection de Jésus.
The day is near studyweekend
We can look back on an interesting study weekend.
On Saturday Brother Rudolf Rijkeboer in the first study wondered if it was really so that we could be facing the end times. He brought some hypothetical posings and compared the different theorem. He also questioned how we could know if the return of Christ was in front of us and how the beginning of or Jesus getting at the door would not have to mean the end is here.
““And you shall begin to hear of fightings and reports of fightings. See that you are not troubled, for these have to take place, but the end is not yet. “For nation shall rise against nation, and reign against reign. And there shall be scarcities of food, and deadly diseases, and earthquakes in places. “And all these are the beginning of birth pains. ” (Matthew 24:6-8 The Scriptures 1998+)
““And learn this parable from the fig tree: When its branch has already become tender and puts forth leaves, you know that the summer is near. “So you also, when you see all these, know that He is near, at the doors. ” (Matthew 24:32-33 The Scriptures 1998+)
Mount of Olives, from Sherover-Hass-Goldman promenade in East Talpiot - Photo: David Lisbona
Today we can see that Israel is getting more and more isolated. More people are showing their resistance against Jerusalem and are acting against Israelites.
In the third study of the Saturday brother Rudolf placed all the fights of Israel in the picture. On Sunday, in Belgium we went on looking at Antiochius IV Epiphanes, how he considered the Jews a strange element in his Empire. On Sunday Steve Robinson and Marcus Ampe talked about those days of Epiphanes and the dates given by Daniel.
We saw that also in his and other times the matter of ‘end-times’ was more than ones on the tongue of people. Also when people got to see certain happenings or signs, they wondered: “how long will these wonders last?” In Daniels time a man swore by him who lives forever that it would be for a time, times and a half, and that it will be when the the power of the holy people is no longer being shattered that all these things will end. and several could hear this, but couldn’t understand what it meant. Also Daniel wondered what it meant and asked God, what the outcome of all this would be ?
But at that time these words were to remain secret and sealed until the time of the end. And even at the time of the send Messiah that prophet, being called the son of god, did not know when the end times would be coming. Though Jesus also warned people to be prepared and to be always ready, because as it was declared to Daniel, many will purify, cleanse and refine themselves; but the wicked will keep on acting wickedly, and none of the wicked will understand. But those with discernment will understand. from the time the regular burnt offering is taken away and the abomination that causes desolation is set up, there will be 1,290 days from Daniels time we were told that something serious was going to happen. How blessed will be anyone who waits and arrives at the 1,335 days. But you, go your way until the end comes. Then you will rest and rise for your reward, at the end of days.
When Daniel was in his late 80’s or over 90 he understood that Jeremiah’s 70 years had come to an end. The time for the return of the Jews had come and he pleaded with Jehovah God to forgive Israel for their sins and to look with favour on the sanctuary now desolate. God’s response was to tell Daniel of the seventy sevens the 490 years when atonement for transgression will be made by the Messiah. The sin offering will end and righteousness will come to pass. Daniel was being shown that Messiah (The Christ or Anointed One) would take away iniquity. Daniel became filled with visions and time periods of the latter days but is told “As for you Daniel go your way till the end. You will rest and then at the end of the days will rise to receive your allotted inheritance.” (Daniel 12:13)
The hand-writing upon the wall / Js. Gillray invt. & ft. Napoleon, Josephine, French soldiers and women seated at feast with dishes "Bank of England," "St. James," "Tower of London," and "Roast Beef of old England." Napoleon looks in horror at hand of Jehovah pointing to words in sky: "Mene mene, tekel upharsin." - James Gillray (1757–1815)
(Daniel 12:1-13 The Scriptures 1998+)
Jesus who knew his Father is greater than him, was content by not knowing the day the end would come. “But concerning that day and the hour no one knows, not even the messengers of the heavens, but My Father only. {Footnote:Mk. 13:32}. ” (Matthew 24:36 The Scriptures 1998+)
““Watch therefore, for you do not know what hour your Master is coming. “And know this, that if the master of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched and not allowed his house to be broken into. “Because of this, be ready too, for the Son of Ad?am is coming at an hour when you do not expect Him. ” (Matthew 24:42-44 The Scriptures 1998+)
Mark Hale looked at the many years that passed, at the days of Noah, Sodom and Gomorrah and the descendants of Abraham, Mesopotamia and Egypt and how we saw in history the political story nicely fitting in Gods Plan. While brother Mark Hale asked us if we should be full of fright or be comforted, brother Rijkeboer showed us how we could learn from the past.
Mark Hale in the 4th study showed us what we have to do and how we could look at the signs we should see in this world. But also how we do have to be aware how history has proven that everything has to go according the Plan of God and people should be careful not to work against this Plan, delaying in such instance the return of Christ.
We should learn from what is written in the Scriptures and what has happened in the history of times.
“For whatever was written before was written for our instruction,1 that through endurance and encouragement of the Scriptures we might have the expectation. Footnote: 11 Cor. 10:11, 2 Tim. 3:16-17. ” (Romans 15:4 The Scriptures 1998+)
“Take heed not to refuse the One speaking. For if those did not escape who refused the warning on earth, much less we who turn away from Him from heaven, “
(Hebrews 12:25 The Scriptures 1998+)
““So you also, when you see these matters take place, know that the reign of Elohim is near. ” (Luke 21:31 The Scriptures 1998+)
“So when they had come together, they asked Him, saying, “Master, would You at this time restore the reign to Yisra’ĕl?”1 Footnote: 1Lk. 1:33. And He said to them, “It is not for you to know times or seasons which the Father has put in His own authority. ” (Acts 1:6-7 The Scriptures 1998+)
““Now I say to you, before it takes place, that when it does take place, you shall believe that I am.” (John 13:19 The Scriptures 1998+)
““Peace I leave with you – My peace I give to you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid. “You heard that I said to you, ‘I am going away and I am coming to you.’ If you did love Me, you would have rejoiced that I said, ‘I am going to the Father,’ for My Father is greater than I. “And now I have told you before it takes place, that when it does take place, you shall believe. “I shall no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming,1 and he possesses none at all in Me, Footnote: 1See Lk. 4:6. but, in order for the world to know that I love the Father, and that as the Father commanded Me, so I am doing. Rise up, let us go from here. ” (John 14:27-31 The Scriptures 1998+)
When we do all the signs around us we can clearly notice we are really coming to the predicted time of the return of Christ. But having to face the change in times, with people acting as it was prophesied we should understand that during the last days, scoffers will come, following their own desires and asking, “where is this promised ‘coming’ of his? for our fathers have died, and everything goes on just as it has since the beginning of creation.” We do know people will laugh with us and lots of them would not believe us. Others also do everything to bring us in discredit.
Everyday we should have the Word of God accompanying us and bringing us assurance. We may not overlook the fact that it was by God’s word that long ago there were heavens, and there was land which arose out of water and existed between the waters, and that by means of these things the world of that time was flooded with water and destroyed. It is by that same Word that the present heavens and earth, having been preserved, are being kept for fire until the day of judgement, when ungodly people will be destroyed. Moreover, dear friends, do not ignore this: with the Lord Elohim the One who has everything in His hands, one day is like a thousand years and a thousand years like one day {Psalms 90:4}. For us it may seem to be a very long time, sometimes even too long. But we may be happy that Jehovah is not slow in keeping His promise, as some people think of slowness; on the contrary, He is patient with us; for it is not His purpose that anyone should be destroyed, but that everyone should turn from his sins.
“knowing this first: that mockers shall come in the last days with mocking, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all continues as from the beginning of creation.” For they choose to have this hidden from them: that the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, by the Word of Elohim,1Footnote: 1Heb. 11:3. through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water. And the present heavens and the earth are treasured up by the same Word, being kept for fire, to a day of judgment and destruction of wicked men. But, beloved ones, let not this one matter be hidden from you: that with יהוה one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. יהוה is not slow in regard to the promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward us, not wishing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.1 Footnote: 11 Tim. 2:4. “(2 Peter 3:3-9 The Scriptures 1998+)
“And when these matters begin to take place, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near.” (Luke 21:28 The Scriptures 1998+)
“And I heard a loud voice from the heaven saying, “See, the Booth of Elohim is with men, and He shall dwell with them, and they shall be His people, and Elohim Himself shall be with them and be their Elohim. ” (Revelation 21:3 The Scriptures 1998+)
+++
Dutch readers please do find about the study weekend the articles in Dutch:
De Dag is nabij #1 Voortdurende moeilijkheden
De Dag is nabij #2 Bruikbare informatie
De Dag is nabij #3 Niet laten verrassen
De Dag is nabij #5 Terugkijken naar verleden
De Dag is nabij #7 Thema van de dag
Related articles
- Delving into the Scriptures and Discovering the Answers (prweb.com)
Author Ron Braley explains what the Bible, history and prophecy say about the end of our world without pushing an end-times agenda or any particular view. Braley believes that a poor foundation leads to weak or little faith which can open the door for the end-times deception. - Jesus begotten Son of God #7 A matter of the Future (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- The dark side of our earthly existence (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
The previous years we heard many times that this world was going to go under. The end was near said more than one prophet. - Rugby Prophecy Day (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Called Out by Name (antwrites.com)
Matthew 24:37-44 As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be when the Son of man comes. he people then carried on unsuspectingly until the flood came and killed them all. This is how it will be when I come next, at a time when you least expect. Then there will be two people working; one will be taken, the other left. Therefore, be ready and keep watch of the Day your Lord comes. 1 Thessalonians 5:4-6
[It has always been thought that this passage in Matthew refers to the Return of Jesus in His glory, but even a quick look at Revelation shows that this event cannot be at the Return, as that will not be unexpected, because it is exactly 1260 days after the Anti Christ desecrates the Temple. The next thing prophesied, that will come ‘ like a thief’, is the punishment of the nations instigated by Jesus and graphically described in over 100 prophesies, as a coronal mass ejection, that will clear and cleanse the Land of Israel in preparation for ‘ the homecoming of His people’. Ezekiel 36:8, Isaiah 65:9, Isaiah 49:22, Ezekiel 37:21, Jeremiah 16:14-16, Zechariah 10:8-12]
- I’ve Been Where Jesus WILL Return… (pastorron7.wordpress.com)
But of all the places in Israel… there was ONE I wanted to visit most… The Mount of Olives. Why? Because 1) That was where Jesus ascended to heaven (CLICK HERE and HERE), and 2) That is where Jesus will return… LITERALLY (CLICK). - A Skeleton Comes Alive (guapotg.wordpress.com)
there has been the return of Jews from Babylon to Israel after the 70-year exile in the 5th century before Messiah. But this was only the tribes of Judah and Benjamin which were involved in this particular instance.
+
YHVH has already started moving the Jews back to Israel since the beginning of the 20th century. The city of Jerusalem has also been re-established as the capital of Israel under loud protest of most of the nations.
+
Who would have dreamt in 1945, with the discovery of the death camps for Jews in Germany, that this same badly marred Jewish nation would declare the independent State of Israel in 1948, only three years later?
+
YHVH does not misdirect – chopping and changing all the time. He repeatedly emphasises the fact that He will not change nor erase His Word, His Law or the Covenant. - Israel Prayer Watch: Daniel, Persia & Greece by Asher Intrater (pastorjuan.com)
The process of spiritual warfare started with Daniel humbling himself and studying the Scriptures to find out God’s plan for Israel and the end times. This combination of humility, Scripture study, and God’s plan for Israel and the end times is the foundation for spiritual warfare in our generation as well.
+
It is more than a coincidence that these two powers: Islamic extremism and the United Nations have concentrated their efforts in condemning Israel.We are facing the same spiritual battle that Daniel faced. In fact the Angel of the Lord explicitly told him that the fullness of this battle would take place in the end times.
- Israel abandoning Har HaZeitim (Mount of Olives)? (ifaynsh.wordpress.com)
- Mountains and the promises of the gospel (creationconcept.wordpress.com)
the meaning of mountains in prophecy is connected with the promises of the gospel. -
- Interpreting the mountains of prophecy (creationconcept.wordpress.com)
- The desolation prophecies (creationconcept.wordpress.com)
- Is the promised land visible, or invisible? (creationconcept.wordpress.com)
- The heavenly mount Zion, a better country (creationconcept.wordpress.com)
Manifests for believers #4 Eucharist
In the previous article Manifests for believers #3 Catholic versus Protestant we pointed already at the idea of the opponents of the Manifest for believers Manifest Gelovigen nemen het woord (Religiuously or Believers take the word)who do find that a lay men can not bring a sermon and also should not be allowed to say the sacred words of the consecration, nor hand out the bread and wine at the Holy Communion!” The conservative Catholics say. Also the “gegraai” or the groping in the tabernacle (the goblet), that we see now always more, is a real plague! “Women must remain with their hands from the tabernacle!” Asking that women should be able to become priests is something they do not believe the writers of the manifest are really asking. Though in the manifest Gelovigen nemen het woord is written: “We plead in favour that within the shortest time as well married men as women shall be permitted the priest office. We, religious, need them now very badly.
A delegation of the study Group Kerkenwerk (Churchwork) on Thursday 9 February, in Malines (Mechelen) handed over the Manifesto “Religiously take the word” to the Flemish bishops and has given them the list of the names of the signatories.
The Manifesto, that is a call at the Flemish bishops to break through the impasse, in which the Churches in Flanders is been found, through reformation, is endorsed by 8235 religiously, mainly via the internet, some also written.
Emmanuel Van Lierde has the impression that petitions, it appears to be well a new trend in the Flemish church. A first observed petition was that ‘for a credible and liberating church’. Ends 2010 signed 6,800 religiously that signal to encouragement in full peadofilicrisis. More recent there were petitions ‘against the secular dictatorship’ with about 3,000 signatures, against the abstraction of the service of the Brussels Saint-Kathelijnekerk with more than 6,100 signatories and on the manifesto Religious take the word followed the counter action Religious accept the word with a 200 signatories.
According to the study Group Kerkenwerk the plea to let married men and women come into the priest office, has to be seen in the frame to make it possible to have the Church grow in these difficult times in which we do need more diversification in which creatively should be sought to new roads round the multiplicity of talents and to utilize better the engagement of many religious people.
That some of the signing members of the manifest also do not believe in transubstantiation, meaning that the piece of bread given to the believers, is really the body of Christ, is pure heresy and apostasy according the opponents. For the conservatives it is clear that men as Dekimpe praise no longer the transubstantiation! They do forget that Pope Innocent III had recognized (1215) the doctrine of transubstantiation, which resulted in the public and general worship of the consecrated host. The doctrine, first elaborated by theologians in the 13th century, was incorporated into documents of the Council of Trent. In the mid-20th century, some Roman Catholic theologians interpreted it as referring to a change of meaning rather than a change of substance, but in 1965 Paul VI called for the retention of the original dogma. According to the conservative Catholics the writers of the manifest ignore the fact of the Real Presence, which is, indeed, the central dogma every Catholic should hold on.
Although the manna, a type of the Eucharist, was indeed eaten with the mouth, it could not, being a transitory food, ward off death. The second food, that offered by the Heavenly Father, is the bread of heaven, which He dispenses hic et nunc to the Jews for their spiritual nourishment, inasmuch as by reason of the Incarnation He holds up His Son to them as the object of their faith. If, however, the third kind of food, which Christ Himself promises to give only at a future time, is a new refection, differing from the last-named food of faith, it can be none other than His true Flesh and Blood, to be really eaten and drunk in Holy Communion. This is why Christ was so ready to use the realistic expression “to chew” (John 6:54, 56, 58: trogein) when speaking of this, His Bread of Life, in addition to the phrase, “to eat” (John 6:51, 53: phagein).*
“I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live for ever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” Then the Jews began to argue sharply among themselves, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” Jesus said to them, “I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him. Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your forefathers ate manna and died, but he who feeds on this bread will live for ever.”” (John 6:51-58 NIV)
Catholics do believe that Jesus is God who gives his blood and body daily to those members of the Holy Roman Catholic Church, the highest form of civilization, who come to His table. Only believers liberated from their sins by the confession are allowed to take this manlike god in their mouth but may not chew on him, because mastication of God would be a big sin. Here we can see again an other pagan idolatry and Christian image-worship. The host has lost the symbol of the bread being a representation of the ‘Bread of Life’. The Catholics take it to be really the Holy sacred body of God, and in many churches you can find relic-worship of this consecrated host being put in golden receptacles, called the monstrance. In lots of Roman Catholic Churches it is exposed for the adoration of the people.In older times we did find already reactions against this adoration of a piece of bread.
As late as 1820 a great jubilee was celebrated at Brabant in commemoration of the desecration of the host at Enghien in 1370. This festival lasted eight days, during which sixteen hosts studded with diamonds were borne in solemn procession through the streets. Fifty years later (1870), while a committee and the clergy of Brussels were making preparations for this ancient festival, an article appeared in the “Revue Belgique,” entitled “Le Jubilé d’un Faux Miracle,” etc., which proved by the original sources that, although three Jews had been burned in 1370 on the charge of having stolen a host, “pro sacramentis punice et furtive captis,” the original document had been changed sixty-five years later to read “pro sacramento puncto et furtive accepto,” in order to fabricate an accusation of desecration of the host. Other falsifications being discovered in the document, Pope Pius IX felt obliged to stop the festival. In the Church of Sainte-Gudule, Brussels, are several Gobelin tapestries containing representations of the supposed desecration of the host in 1370.**
The refutation of the so-called Sacramentarians, a name given by Luther to those who opposed the Real Presence, evinces as clearly the impossibility of a figurative meaning. Once the manifest literal sense is abandoned, occasion is given to interminable controversies about the meaning of an enigma which Christ supposedly offered His followers for solution. *
Only ordained people who abstain from sex can bless the bread of the Lord’s Supper and say “This is my body” after which they may hand out the body of Christ, god the son, the conservative Catholics say. Asking to allow women to be able to say this is degrading the Holy Sacrament and blasphemy.(***)
The writers of the Manifest not speaking of the wine miraculously becoming the blood of Christ and the bread miraculously becoming the body of Christ seem to offend many.
But Jesus does speak of the symbology of our taking the wine and the bread as representing our unity with one another and with us being involved with the sacrifice of Christ. As Jesus said in Matthew 10:38 “whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me” and Paul in Romans 6:5-13
For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his. (6) We know that our old self was crucified with him in order that the body of sin might be brought to nothing, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin. (7) For one who has died has been set free from sin. (8) Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him. (9) We know that Christ, being raised from the dead, will never die again; death no longer has dominion over him. (10) For the death he died he died to sin, once for all, but the life he lives he lives to God. (11) So you also must consider yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus. (12) Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, to make you obey its passions. (13) Do not present your members to sin as instruments for unrighteousness, but present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life, and your members to God as instruments for righteousness.
+
*Proof from Scripture – The real presence as a fact > The Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist
**Defiling the host or sacred wafer of the mass: desecration of host
(***) God can not die, but Jesus, being a man could die but only once. A “re-sacrifice” of Jesus Christ for our sins, or a “re-offering / re-presentation” of His sacrifice is not necessary. Scripture says, that Jesus died “once for all” and does not need to be sacrificed again (Hebrews 10:10; 1 Peter 3:18). Hebrews 7:27 declares, “Unlike the other high priests, He (Jesus) does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when He offered Himself.” The bread and the wine are symbols of the body and blood of Jesus, but are not a representation of God nor His body or his blood (Because God is a ghost and has no body or blood as human beings.) The bread Jesus was breaking represented what he was going to do. The same for the wine he gave them – his blood hadn’t yet been shed, but the wine represented the blood that would be shed. These words were not meant to be taken in a literal sense then, nor are they now.
Preceding article: Manifests for believers #3 Catholic versus Protestant
To be continued: Manifests for believers #5 Christian Union
++
Please do find to read:
Is Jesus Christ actually present in the bread and wine of the Eucharist/communion?
The Lord’s supper is done both to help Christians remember what Jesus has done, and also to proclaim what Jesus has done (‘For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes’: 1 Cor. 11:26).
What is Holy Communion? Why is it necessary to a Christian’s life?Children ate the OT passover so why not NT bread and wine?Are the bread and wine just symbols, or are they really Jesus flesh and blood?Why did Jesus say he wouldn’t drink wine again until the kingdom when he ate and drank other things? (Mark 14:25)Why wasn’t the lying prophet killed? (1 Kings 13)
Who Can Receive Communion? according Catholics
+++
Related articles
- Manifests for believers #1 Sex abuse setting fire to the powder (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Manifests for believers #2 Changing celibacy requirement (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Manifests for believers #3 Catholic versus Protestant (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Een Manifest voor Gelovigen (marcusampe.wordpress.com)
- Manifest tot protestantse kerk | Marcus’ s Space (marcusampe.wordpress.com)
- Manifestanten Protestant of Katholiek | Marcus’ s Space (marcusampe.wordpress.com)
- Touch Jesus and be healed through faith (cinhosa.wordpress.com)
During The Eucharist, The Church teaches that the host and wine are consecrated by the priest. After the consecration, they become the body and blood of Jesus Christ through transubstantiation. So that Catholics (and other Christian denominations) believe that upon receipt the Blessed Sacrament, we touch Jesus – literally.
+
For additional reading, the Real presence of Christ in the Eucharist contains an overview of various Christian denominations and their belief (or not) in transubstantiation. The Catholic Encyclopedia has a reference article for additional information. - Audio for Eucharist (lettersonorthodoxy.wordpress.com)
Here’s some additional audio resources regarding the Eucharist - Eucharist : Communion or Discrimination?? (catholicakauniversal.wordpress.com)

Eucharist has been a controversial topic, specially in a multicultural and multi-religious continent like Asia.
+
In the Hindu temple they offer the devotees Prasad a food offering made to a god and then shared among the people, to both Hindus and non-Hindus.
+
we can Evangelize better if we understood the real concept of the Eucharist that Christ explained to us. This is something that has to be considered instead of arguing whether we should receive communion directly on hand or tongue. It would be more meaningful if we call everyone for a fellowship, a real communion without discriminating others with the sentence announced during the mass “Non-Christians are not allowed to receive Communion!” And I hope that they will dawn someday
Till then, Eucharist is only for the Baptized Christians! - The Holy Eucharist – The Bread of Life (catholicsview.wordpress.com)
The mysticism of the Christian faith has been eaten away by society. Despite miracles being recorded throughout history, as people of God we have lost faith in them. The mystery of transubstantiation (bread and wine becoming the body and blood of Jesus) is one of these miracles that occur at each Mass across the world. Non-catholic churches that used to believe in the Eucharist have gone from believing in transubstantiation to, “If you think it’s real for you, then it is real” and “it is only a symbol” in order to conform to societies’ ideals and beliefs. - Contraception, Spilling One’s “Seed” and the Obama Health Care Ruling (woodgatesview.com)
Ahh Catholicism. What fond memories I have about my first Communion, Confirmation, serving my first Mass as an alter boy and best of all, my awareness of sin. Without sin in our lives there is chaos. There can be no understanding for our purpose on earth and what lies in store for us afterwards without a sense of our sinful life. - Catechistic Introduction (boyd41.wordpress.com)
Catechistic Notes includes posts on Christian Faith and Worship. These posts comprise paraphases, quotes, references, and personal impressions from several catechistic documents. - A Bunch of Ignorance and a Mammoth of Delusion (esoriano.wordpress.com)
If what is in the cup is the real blood of Jesus, how can the mass be an unbloody sacrifice? If what is in the cup is only symbolic blood, it is also symbolically bloody, doesn’t it follow?
+
Praying and praising His name is symbolic of the incense which is pure sacrifice that will reach the throne of the Almighty! It is not something material, for then, not everyone would have access to it. It is not something readily found in those who prefer to delude themselves by way of ascribing spiritual presence to bread and wine that they call Christ’s body and blood – which they offer again and again.
TD Jakes Breaks Down the Trinity, Addresses Being Called a ‘Heretic’
On the The Christian Post was published an article by Nicola Menzie we would like to share with our readers, plus with our brothers and sisters in the ecclesia.
The magazine lets apologetics author Mark Mittelberg warn that an increasing number of Christians are drifting away from their faith because of the lack of good answers to their spiritual questions and at the same time looks into the the second installment of the Elephant Room, a theological roundtable featuring blunt conversations among seven influential pastors.
Pastor James MacDonald, who shared moderator duties with Pastor Mark Driscoll, may have helped eliminate the fireworks that took place during Round 1 of the Elephant Room but there were plenty of repercussions before and after the Round 2 discussion.
MacDonald had drawn critics for inviting Bishop T. D. Jakes. Many Reformed Christians accused Jakes of being a “heretic” due to his purported belief in modalism – the insistence that members of the Holy Trinity are not three distinct, eternally co-existing persons, but only forms of God (a singular spirit), a doctrine held by Oneness Apostolic Pentecostals.
For that reason, conservative evangelicals and leaders at The Gospel Coalition allegedly began pressuring MacDonald to “pull the plug” on Bishop Jakes’ appearance at the Elephant Room conference, which eventually led MacDonald to resign as a TGC council member.
“It has cost me some relationships,” said MacDonald during one of the final sessions on Wednesday. “I thought I knew what the Lord wanted me to do, and I had good counsel. Craig Groeschel has a lot of wisdom, and he said to me, ‘Just because someone doesn’t want you in their circle anymore doesn’t mean they can’t be in yours.’”
Mark Driscoll, founding pastor at Mars Hill Church in Seattle, was raised Catholic. Some Catholics know about Jesus but according to him he wasn’t one of them. “A pastor’s daughter gave me a Bible. She’s now my wife.” he said. ” I was reading Romans in college for a philosophy class. I finally understood sin is pride. I thought it was just bad moral behavior and I considered myself fairly moral. I had a whole lot of pride and still do. God convicted me of my sin and opened my heart to Jesus reading the book of Romans. So, a Catholic boy reading the book of Romans. Go figure. Jesus made sense and I had to go find a church.”
James MacDonald, founding pastor of Harvest Bible Chapel in Chicago, gave his life to Jesus Christ when he was 7 years old. “It was February of 1967. It was after a Sunday night service. Our pastor had preached the Gospel and I was too fearful to go down front during the invitation. But when I went home I was still under conviction and I went out into the kitchen and asked my parents, and my mom led me to Christ. I wandered from the Lord during my teenage years, and though I tried to let go of the Lord, He never let go of me. I had more return experiences, but I know that I know that God knows that I am a child of God today.”

(L-R) T.D. Jakes, Jack Graham, Mark Driscoll, James MacDonald, Wayne Cordeiro, Steven Furtick, and Crawford Loritts appear at "The Elephant Room" 2012 roundtable on Jan. 25, 2012.
MacDonald and Driscoll organized for the first time ‘The Elephant Room discussions’ in 2011 and believe that by talking openly about their differences in series of “blunt conversations”, pastors and church leaders can assist in edifying the Church.
This year the seven pastors participating in the event all agreed that in a Gospel presentation there are five elements that are key: recognition of sin, that Jesus lived without sin, Jesus’ death and resurrection, repentance, and faith.
Weighing in on the debate, Bishop T.D. Jakes of The Potter’s House in Dallas warned that pastors run into problems when they start comparing different styles and methods of Gospel presentations and ministry.
“We are in an age where we want to come up with a recipe for everything,” he said. “When we try to get methodology down to a science we defy the mystery of the Gospel.”
Prior to Wednesday’s event, Pastor James MacDonald – also the moderator
of the discussions along with Driscoll – had drawn critics for inviting Bishop T. D. Jakes to the Elephant Room, in regards to his beliefs about the Godhead.
Many Reformed Christians accuse Jakes of being a “heretic” due to his purported belief in modalism – the insistence that members of the Holy Trinity are not three distinct, eternally co-existing persons, but only forms of God (a singular spirit), a doctrine held by Oneness Apostolic Pentecostals.
For that reason, conservative evangelicals and leaders at The Gospel Coalition allegedly began pressuring MacDonald to “pull the plug” on Bishop Jakes’ appearance at the Elephant Room conference, which eventually led MacDonald to resign as a TGC council member. Bishop T.D. Jakes, pastor of The Potter’s House megachurch in Dallas, Texas, founded by Jakes in 1996, was put on the spot during a theological roundtable Wednesday in regards to his beliefs about the Godhead and why, in some Christian circles, he is considered a “heretic.”
Despite the tension, MacDonald stuck with his decision and kept Jakes in line as a speaker.
During Round 2 of the Elephant Room, the Jakes finally broke down his view of the Trinity and also addressed him being labeled a “heretic.”
Jakes himself admitted that he once clung to a modalist position due to his background – he was converted and raised at an Oneness church. But he believes differently now, embracing the conservative evangelical doctrine of the Trinity: one God, three persons (though he said he’s not crazy about the word “persons.”)
Modalism, a 3rd-century teaching accredited to theologian Sabellius, purports that the members of the Trinity are not three distinct, eternally co-existing persons, but that instead God, a singular spirit, discloses Himself at different times in three modes – a doctrine espoused by Oneness Apostolic Pentecostal and United Pentecostal Church Internationaldenominations.
When asked a series of questions by Driscoll clarifying his doctrine, Jakes affirmed that there was “very little difference” between what he believed and what the Mars Hill
pastor believed.

(L-R) T.D. Jakes, James MacDonald and Mark Driscoll appear at "The Elephant Room" 2012 roundtable on Jan. 25, 2012.
In October Jakes tweeted to his followers the following message: “God brings us together so that He can dwell in the midst of our unity, the church must lift up a standard of unity.”
Silva, an ordained Southern Baptist Convention minister, also questioned Jakes by tweeting to The Potter’s House pastor : “@BishopJakes Which God are you talking about? The Triune God of the Bible, or the ficticious god of modalism? Which one do you believe in?”
It was then that a minor debate ensued between Jakes and Silva regarding his beliefs about the Holy Trinity, with Jakes tweeting: “@RealKenSilva Ken I believe in Jesus
Christ the only begotten of the Father. I believe in the Holy Spirit sent to the world by the Father!”
Jakes addressed the issue already in 2000 in an op-ed article in Christianity Today, in which he wrote: “I believe in one God who is the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. I believe these three have distinct and separate functions—so separate that each has individual attributes, yet are one. I do not believe in three Gods.”
Criticism was hurled at MacDonald for inviting Jakes to be one of the seven pastors featured in The Elephant Room’s new round of conversations because of the Woman, Thou Art Loosed author’s perceived stance regarding the Holy Trinity.
MacDonald denied on his website that inviting Jakes to The Elephant Room was essentially an endorsement of the Texas minister’s doctrinal beliefs, as he had been accused. MacDonald, under the title “I do not agree that T.D. Jakes is a Modalist,” wrote in a September post on his website:
“I affirm the doctrine of the Trinity as I find it in Scripture. I believe this doctrine is revealed in the Bible and accurately expressed in historic confessionalism. T.D. Jakes website states that he believes God has existed eternally in three manifestations which is modalist language. I am looking forward to hearing him explain his position currently and how that may have changed from things he has said historically. … I believe T.D. Jakes shows immense humility by being
willing to step outside his own circles to interact with christian leaders and discuss his theology. … We are greatly honored that T.D. Jakes has agreed to participate.”
Tim Challies, one of the most influential and widely read evangelical Christian bloggers, also commented on the controversy recently.
While confessing that he does not know for certain if Jakes is a modalist, Challies wrote: “What is clear is that whatever Jakes believes about the Trinity, he has shown a continual reluctance to affirm a standard, time-proven creedal statement of trinitarian orthodoxy and that he has often used the language of modalism. This gives us valid cause for concern.”
As MacDonald and Challies also noted, the express purpose of The Elephant Room is to foster relationships with and open discussions among Christians who hold disagreements about Scripture.
During Wednesday’s “Elephant Room” conversation on the “majors” of Christian doctrine, Jakes explained where he falls on the issue.
“My father was a Methodist and my mother was a Baptist,” he explained. “I was raised in the Baptist church … but I didn’t really have a real committed experience with Christ until my father died. When my father died, I had a real experience with Christ, a real conversion with Christ and I had it in a Oneness church.”
The minister emphasized to Driscoll that the Pentecostal congregation he was referencing, which he pointed out was not a UPCI church, was home to “Christians who believe in Jesus Christ, believe he died, rose from the dead, is coming back again — all the same things you do.”
“How they describe and explain the Godhead in a traditional Oneness sense is very different than how traditional Trinitarians describe the Gospel. I was in that church for a number of years and raised in that church for a number of years,” Jakes said.
“As I began to progress, I began to understand that some of the dogma that I was taught in the Oneness movement was very dogmatic, very narrow and not the very best
description of how I now understand the Godhead,” he continued.
“My struggle as I was ordained in the Oneness church was in several passages – sometimes the doctrine fit, sometimes it doesn’t. When the doctrine becomes the primary thing, you force it into fitting in places where it doesn’t fit. I really at this point in my life don’t want to force my theology to fit in my denomination.”
Referencing Gen. 1:26, Luke 3:21-22, John 14:11 and other passages that he believes point to Jesus, God the Father and the Holy Spirit as having unique distinctions, Jakes revealed: “That began to make me re-think some of my ideas and some of the things I was taught.”
-
(Photo: The Elephant Room/Alyssa Armour)Bishop T.D. Jakes appears at “The Elephant Room” 2012 roundtable on Jan. 25, 2012.
“I got kind of quiet about it for a while. When you’re a leader and you’re in a position of authority sometimes you have to back up … for a minute and really think those things through.”
Driscoll, near the end of the discussion, pointedly asked Jakes if he believes the Bible is “the perfect, inspired, final authority Word of God,” to which Jakes responded “absolutely.”
Driscoll then posed several other creedal questions in quick succession, to which Jakes responded in the affirmative:
“You believe there is one God, three persons: Father, Son and Spirit? You believe Jesus was fully God, fully man?”
“You believe he died on the cross in our place, for our sins?”
“You believe he bodily rose from death?”
“You believe that he is the judge of the living and the dead?”
“You believe that apart from Jesus there’s no salvation?”
Jakes told Driscoll once more that “there is very little difference between what I believe and what you believe.”
“For you, the issue between Trinitarianism and modalism at its essence is one God manifesting Himself successively in three ways, or one God, three persons, simultaneously existing eternally. Your best understanding now … would you say it’s ‘one God manifesting Himself in three ways’ or ‘one God in three persons?’” Driscoll asked.
“I believe that neither one of them totally get it for me,” Jakes revealed, yet expressing his agreement with the description of “one God, three persons.”
“Here is why I am there. I am not crazy about the word ‘persons’ … most people who know me know that … my doctrinal statement is really no different from yours except for the word ‘manifest’ instead of ‘person,’ which you describe as modalist and I describe as Pauline,” Jakes insisted, before quoting 1 Timothy 3:16.
The passage in the English Standard Version reads: “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”
“That is what Paul describes as a ‘mystery’ and I don’t think we should do that,” the bishop said. “Now, Paul is not a modalist, but he does not think it is robbery to the divinity of God to say God was ‘manifest’ in the flesh,” Jakes argued.
“When we start talking about that sort of thing, I think that it is important that we realize that there are distinctives between the Father and the working of the Son: the Father
didn’t bleed, the Father didn’t die, only in the person of Jesus Christ, coming back for us in the person of Jesus Christ … Jesus Christ has been with us, but only indwelt in the person of the Holy Spirit. We are baptized into the Body of Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit. That is consistent with my belief system.”
He added, “We are taught in our society that if we disagree within a movement, we leave … we sever. I still have fellowship associations, relationships and positions within and without Oneness and Trinitarian movements because I believe that until we bridge the gap between our thinking, and humble both sides and say ‘we’re both attempting to describe a God we love, that we serve and that we have not seen, and that we are viewing Him through the context of the Scriptures but that with a glass darkly’ – why should I fall out and hate and throw names at you when all that I know and understand, be it very Orthodox, is still through a glass darkly?”
Jakes acknowledged that he is considered a “heretic” in many communities, including Oneness and Trinitarian circles, yet it does not bother him, as he is more focused on the Body of Christ working as one unit in love, despite disagreements – the one thing, he asserted, that Christians have the power to do, but fail to accomplish.
“I think the time has come for us to be willing to take the heat to have a conversation, because if we do not do this and we continue to divide ourselves by ourselves and compare ourselves with ourselves, we do it at the expense of decreasing numbers of new Christians in our country. We have to mobilize,” he asserted.
“We have got to learn to talk to each other or we’re going to die,” the megachurch pastor insisted.
+
Please do read:
- The Trinity – the Truth
- Summary on trinity
- The Great Trinity debate
- Why the trinity was accepted in Europe
- How did the Trinity Doctrine Develop + How the Doctrine of the Trinity came to the Church + Historical Development of Trinity
- Trinity functionTrinity function
- Trinity versus Tritheism
- Hashem השם, Hebrew for “the Name” of the Only One God
- God is one
- Creator of heaven and earth and everything around יהוה
- A god between many gods
- God versus gods
- Preexistence in the Divine purpose and Trinity
- 2 Corinthians 5:19 – God in Christ
- How do trinitarians equate divine nature
- The Pagan Influence of The catholic church ……The Pagan Trinity, and Saint B
- Is the Trinity a Biblical Doctrine?: http://notrinity.blogspot.com/2008/06/is-trinity-biblical-doctrine.html
- The Father is the Only True God: http://notrinity.blogspot.com/2008/08/father-is-only-true-god.html
- Who is Jesus #2 Jesus Christ, man who died
- Who is Jesus #4 Clear statements that our heavenly Father is his “God”
- Who is Jesus #8 Father greater than Jesus
- Who is Jesus #9 100% or not
- Who is Jesus #12 Conclusion
- Da Vinci Code: Was Jesus Human or Divine?
- The wrong hero
- Lord or Yahuwah, Yeshua or Yahushua (Video)
- Christendom Has Forgotten
+++
Prior to Wednesday’s event, Pastor James MacDonald – also the moderator of the discuss
Related articles
- Bishop T. D. Jakes says he now embraces the Trinity Doctrine: T. D. Jakes was interviewed by pastor Mark Driscoll and pastor James MacDonald on January 27, 2012 at Harvest Bible Chapel (rootedinchrist.org)
In fact at Berean Perspective we have two articles that have been written dealing with what T. D. Jakes has said he believes concerning the doctrine of the Trinity. T. D. Jakes did not affirm the doctrine of the Trinity and he affirmed the Oneness perspective, thus we labeled him as being in the sect of Modalism. (Oneness Pentecostalism) We believe that Modalism (Oneness Pentecostalism, Jesus Only, United Pentecostal Church International) is a false teaching and has many false doctrines. (check out Oneness Pentecostalism) Now, after reading what was posted from the Baptist Press post (affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention) I am somewhat encouraged and at the same time still not at ease with what T. D. Jakes believes concerning the Trinity Doctrine. - TD Jakes Breaks Down the Trinity, Addresses Being Called a ‘Heretic’ By Nicola Menzie (trinityspeaks.wordpress.com)
- T.D. Jakes is Heretical Concerning Modalism Whether he Believes it or Not (slaughteringthesheep.wordpress.com)
Apprising Ministries continues documenting the sad slide of evanjellyfish deeper into apostasy as spiritual darkness grows.
There is a spiritual form of fascism now being perpetrated within the mainstream of the church visible. It began circa 1997 with the hatching in hell of the neo-liberal cult of the Emergent Church aka the Emerging Church and spreads its evil spores via Contemplative Spirituality/Mysticism (CSM).
+
The use of the term manifestations is the language of classic modalism or Oneness Pentecostalism, not orthodox Christianity. Here’s what we do know, Jakes is with Higher Ground Always Abounding Assemblies, Inc. (HGAAA) where he is Vice Prelate.
+
Well the fact is, modalism—aka Sabellianism, after Sabellius—cannot be reconciled with the Biblical Trinitarian position; i.e. it’s a different god, which is no god at all (Isaiah 43:10; Galatians 4:8).
+Yet another aspect of Modalistic Monarchianism / Modalism / Sabellianism is Patripassianism, which is the view that it was God the Father who became incarnate, suffered, died, and was resurrected. Patripassianism essentially teaches that God the Father became His own Son.
With all that said, Sabellianism, Modalism, Monarchianism (dynamic and modalistic), and Patripassianism are all unbiblical understandings of the relationship between the Persons of the Trinity. (Online source)
- Changed Heart for @StevenFurtick & @BishopJakes: Conviction in The #ElephantRoom. Lessons for dads? (orangedad.com)
These guys are not the only Christian leaders who have been the object of jokes, sarcasm, or just outright accusations of “blasphemy” by me. I am a very, very judgmental person. I hide behind my crappy attitude by saying that it’s in the name of “sound doctrine.” God, heal my heart. -
In The Elephant Room With Trevin Wax (garyware.me)
Elephant Room 2: Live-Blog Session 1 “With a Little Help from My Friends” + Elephant Room 2: Live-Blog Session 2 “Can’t Buy Me Love” + Elephant Room 2: Live-Blog Session 3 “Hard Day’s Night” + Elephant Room 2: Live-Blog Session 4 “Ticket to Ride” + Elephant Room 2: Live-Blog Session 5 “Come Together”: In what ways does being a minority worshiper hinder worship and service in the church? What churches are achieving success at breaking down these walls, and how? What do you see the other pastor doing better than your church does it?+ Elephant Room 2: Live-Blog Session 6 “Help” + Elephant Room 2: Live-Blog Session 7 “We Can Work It Out” + Elephant Room 2: Live-Blog Session 8 Speed Round - An Elephant Room Roundup (garyware.me)
Trevin Wax offers a summary reflection after his marathon effort posting notes on each Elephant Room session.
Carl Trueman notes that apparently all the authorisation a celebrity pastor needs is the affirmation of other celebrity pastors and that a few questions in a talk show format doesn’t really equate to a probing examination of someone’s theology.
Ed Stetzer offers his perspective.
Frank Turk observes that there are a few other elephants in Jakes’ living room which were rather conveniently ignored so everyone could feel the love. - Steven Furtick and Maturity (theologicalarsenal.wordpress.com)
When the question “Where do you see the Church in 20 years?” was posed Furtick quietly thought for a second, smiled and said “I’m really not old enough to speak to that… I’ve only been around for 31 years and I just don’t have the experience to answer that question.” He then went on to add that he is hopeful for the future of the Church and that he believes that we build the future, and that he would do his best to serve and honor God to the best of his abilities. - Jakes’ Small Beginnings (endtimeebookreviews.wordpress.com)
When he speaks of his humble beginnings, Jakes speak with much fervor and passion, as the congregation agrees with him and can totally relate to what he is talking about. - BEWARE! Rosebrough a No-Go, Bro! (justificationbygrace.com)
most of the church today has bought into the idea that challenging ANY idea is unloving and wrong. We adamantly reject this view. In fact, we think the essence of being loving is to point people to the truth, and away from lies and doctrines of demons. It is truth that sets people free. Lies cannot set people free. - Did I Really Want to Go to Elephant Room 2? (jonwellman.com)
E.R. 2.0 has run into its share of missteps, not the least of which was the invitation of T.D. Jakes.
+
There is an opportunity to make much of Christ in every situation, and E.R. 2.0 is no exception. We’ll see what happens. However, I do fear for viewers and attenders who are not believers or who are easily swayed, and I pray for them. Some points of view are simply not doctrinal and need to be denounced, not discussed. - James MacDonald’s Elephant Room Conference – The Musical (slaughteringthesheep.wordpress.com)
Here is a video from the gang at Wretched Radio about James MacDonald’s Elephant Room Conference, and it is put in a perspective that can only be done by Todd Friel and the crew. - Mark Driscoll And The Mars Hill Churches: When Discipline Becomes Control Becomes … ? (bigcircumstance.com)
Bill Kinnon understandably asks why that bastion of the neo-Reformed movement, the Gospel Coalition, hasn’t spoken out against Mars Hill. Driscoll is one of their council members, and they have had resignations before on grounds of doctrinal controversy, as Bill points out.
+
On the surface, Mars Hill’s devotion to neo-Reformed theology still puts it in the Christian mainstream, which is why I can raise issues about whether the Gospel Coalition is doing anything about one of its Council members. But some cults began with orthodox Christian leaders who then deviated – David Berg of the Children of God could be a case in point here. Mars Hill cannot be regarded as unorthodox, and many of its currently contentious doctrines have been held by large numbers of Christians for a long time. Theologically, it would be wrong for Christians to call it a cult.
Mark Driscoll
- Heretical Modalism and T.D. Jakes Doctrine On the Trinity (antagoniz.wordpress.com)
The United Pentecostal Church (UPCI) is the largest Oneness group in America. They officially deny the doctrine of the Trinity saying: In distinction to the doctrine of the Trinity, the UPCI holds to a oneness view of God. It views the Trinitarian concept of God, that of God eternally existing as three distinctive persons, as inadequate and a departure from the consistent and emphatic biblical revelation of God being one…Thus God is manifested as Father in creation and as the Father of the Son, in the Son for our redemption, and as the Holy Spirit in our regeneration.
+
Again, notice the word “manifest,” which Jakes and the UPCI both use. In other words, the Son of God is the manifestation of the Father in the flesh. The Son is not eternal, nor pre-existent. Jesus is the Father and the Son: Father in his divinity and Son in his humanity. Hence, the Trinity is said to be a misunderstanding of the biblical teaching. - Thabiti Anyabwile addresses McDonald, Jakes and The Elephant Room (theexpositor.wordpress.com)
“Thabiti Anyabwile, Senior Pastor of First Baptist Church of Grand Cayman in the Grand Cayman Islands and a Council member with The Gospel Coalition, posts a tremedous article on The Gospel Coalition website titled Collateral Damage in the Invitation of T.D. Jakes to the Elephant Room, concerning the James McDonald/T.D. Jakes/Elephant Room issue and I think Pastor Anyabwile hits the nail right on the head!” writes the expositor. - Red Alert on Code Orange (preacherfrank.wordpress.com)
The presence of Jakes should be reason enough for the discerning Christian to avoid this event. Even if the rest of the speakers were true teachers, the presence of a false teacher pretty much ruins the whole thing. - How Tall is T.D. Jakes Height and Weight (celebrityheightandweight.com)
T.D. Jakes stands 6 feet and 3 inches tall and weighs 240 pounds. Born in South Charleston, West Virginia, T.D. Jakes opened his first church in a storefront in Montgomery, West Virginia in 1979. By 1982, the parish had grown enough that he was able to focus on his ministry full-time.
+ T.D. Jakes Videos - The Leader of the Episcopal Church is a Heretic (zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com)
There’s not a driplet of Christian orthodoxy which permits her theory or accepts it as legitimate. Either access to God the Father is exclusively available through Christ or it isn’t. It’s either/or not both/and as the Episcopalian Arch-Heretic would have it (along with many pseudo-Christians these days). - Lot’s of Christians Can Only Handle ‘Milk’ (zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com)
The inability of many to distinguish between good doctrine and bad, good biblical exegesis and bad, good theology and bad, is all too common these days (as in ancient times as well). That’s exactly why people like Mark Driscoll, Ted Haggard, TD Jakes, Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, Joyce Meyers, and the bevy of heretics presently passing themselves off as Christian teachers get away with it and aren’t ‘called out’ by either their churches or the Church at large.
Jesus begotten Son of God #20 Before and After
Preceding article: Jesus begotten Son of God #19 Compromising fact
The Anointed begotten Son of God
44. Before
““And now, esteem Me with Yourself, Father, with the esteem which I had with You before the world was.” (John 17:5 The Scriptures 1998+)
Prologue of the gospel of St. John from the Clementine Vulgate, edited by P. Michael Hetzenauer, O.M.Cap. Biblia Sacra, vol. V, Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 1922, p. 197.
“And the esteem which You gave Me I have given them, so that they might be one as We are one, “ (John 17:22 The Scriptures 1998+)
““Father, I desire that those whom You have given Me, might be with Me where I am, so that they see My esteem which You have given Me, because You loved Me before the foundation of the world.” (John 17:24 The Scriptures 1998+)
It is clear then that the glory which both Jesus and the disciples “had” is a glory in promise and prospect. Jesus thus prays to have conferred on him at his ascension the glory which God had undertaken to give him from the foundation of the world. John speaks in Jewish fashion of a pre-existing Purpose, not a pre-existing second Person. Our point was well expressed by a distinguished Lutheran New Testament professor, H.H. Wendt (The System of Christian Teaching, 1907):
“It is clear that John 8:58 [‘Before Abraham was I am’] and 17:5 do not speak of a real pre-existence of Christ. We must not treat these verses in isolation, but understand them in their context.
“The saying in John 8:58, ‘Before Abraham came to be, I am’ was prompted by the fact that Jesus’ opponents had countered his remark in v. 51 by saying that Jesus was not greater than Abraham or the prophets (v. 52). As the Messiah commissioned by God Jesus is conscious of being in fact superior to Abraham and the prophets. For this reason he replies (according to the intervening words, v. 54ff) that Abraham had ‘seen his day,’ i.e., the entrance of Jesus on his historical ministry, and ‘had rejoiced to see’ that day. And Jesus strengthens his argument by adding the statement, which sounded strange to the Jews, that he had even been ‘before Abraham’ (v. 58). This last saying must be understood in connection with v. 56. Jesus speaks in vv. 55, 56 and 58 as if his present ministry on earth stretches back to the time of Abraham and even before. His sayings were perceived by the Jews in this sense and rejected as nonsense. But Jesus obviously did not (in v. 56) mean that Abraham had actually experienced Jesus’ appearance on earth and seen it literally. Jesus was referring to Abraham’s spiritual vision of his appearance on earth, by which Abraham, at the birth of Isaac, had foreseen at the same time the promised Messiah, and had rejoiced at the future prospect of the greater one (the Messiah) who would be Israel’s descendant. Jesus’ reference to his existence before Abraham’s birth must be understood in the same sense. There is no sudden heavenly pre-existence of the Messiah here: the reference is again obviously to his earthly existence. And this earthly existence is precisely the existence of the Messiah. As such, it was not only present in Abraham’s mind, but even before his time, as the subject of God’s foreordination and foresight. The sort of pre-existence Jesus has in mind is ‘ideal’ [in the world of ideas and plans]. In accordance with this consciousness of being the Messiah preordained from the beginning, Jesus can indeed make the claim to be greater than Abraham and the prophets.
“In John 17:5 Jesus asks the Father to give him now the heavenly glory which he had with the Father before the world was. The conclusion that because Jesus possessed a pre-existent glory in heaven he must also have pre-existed personally in heaven is taken too hastily. This is proven by Matthew 6:20 (‘Lay up for yourselves treasure in heaven’), 25:34 (‘Come, you blessed by my Father, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world’), Col. 1:5 (‘the hope which is laid up for you in heaven about which you heard in the word of Truth, the Gospel’), and 1 Peter 1:4 (‘an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, which does not fade away, reserved in heaven for you’). Thus a reward can also be thought of as preexistent in heaven. Such a reward is destined for human beings and already held in store, to be awarded to them at the end of their life. So it is with heavenly glory which Jesus requests. He is not asking for a return to an earlier heavenly condition. Rather he asks God to give him now, at the end of his work as Messiah on earth (v. 4), the heavenly reward which God had appointed from eternity for him, as Messiah. As the Messiah and Son he knows he has been loved and foreordained by the Father from eternity (v. 24). Both John 8:58 and 17:5 are concerned with God’s predetermination of the Messiah” (cp. Teaching of Jesus, pp. 453-460).
Note: Things which are held in store as divine plans for the future are said to be “with God.” Thus in Job 10:13 Job says to God, “These things you have concealed in your heart: I know that this is with You” (see KJV). “He performs what is appointed for me, and many such decrees are with Him” (Job 23:14). Thus the glory which Jesus had “with God” was the glory which God had planned for him as the decreed reward for his Messianic work now completed. The promise of glory “pre-existed,” not Jesus himself. Note that this same glory which Jesus asked for has already been given to you (see John 17:22, 24). It was given to you and Jesus whom God loved before the foundation of the world (v. 24; cp. Eph. 1:4). You may therefore say that you now “have” that glory although it is glory in promise and prospect, to be gained at the Second Coming. Jesus had that same glory in prospect before the foundation of the world (John 17:5). [39. Anthony Buzzard, editor of Focus on the Kingdom in” Jesus' Long-Form Birth Certificate Released by Luke and Matthew (and John), 2000 years ago, and Recorded in Scripture” (June 2011)]
45. After
Paul can say that we now “have” a new body with God in heaven (2 Cor. 5:1) — i.e., we have the promise of it, not in actuality. That body will be ours at our resurrection at the return of Christ. We now “have” it in anticipation and promise only. (“We have a building of God…” 2 Cor. 5:1). We do not in fact have it yet. This is the very Jewish language of promises decreed by God. They are absolutely certain to be fulfilled.
“For we know that if the tent of our earthly house, is destroyed, we have a building from Elohim, a house not made with hands, everlasting in the heavens.” (2 Corinthians 5:1 The Scriptures 1998+)
We do not have our foundation in the dust, but we do come out from the dust and soil and shall return to the soil. As the first man was made from the dust of the earth. He came from the earth. The second man came from heaven because he was placed in the mother’s womb by the divine power of the One and Only God. In the man who wanted to die for all other men we have the treasure of the Good News.
“But Elohim gives it a body as He wishes, and to each seed a body of its own. All flesh is not the same flesh, but there is one flesh of men, and another flesh of beasts, and another of fishes, and another of birds. And there are heavenly bodies and earthly bodies, but the esteem of the heavenly is truly one, and the esteem of the earthly is another, one esteem of the sun, and another esteem of the moon, and another esteem of the stars – for star differs from star in esteem. So also is the resurrection of the dead: it is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption; it is sown in disrespect, it is raised in esteem; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body; there is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. And so it has been written, “The first man Ad’am became a living being,” the last Ad’am a life-giving Spirit. The spiritual, however, was not first, but the natural, and afterward the spiritual. The first man was of the earth, earthy; the second Man is the Master from heaven. As is the earthy, so also are those who are earthy; and as is the heavenly, so also are those who are heavenly.” (1 Corinthians 15:38-48 The Scriptures 1998+)
Adcension of Christ Jesus, the son of God - A page from the Gospel Lectionary portion of the Bamberg Apocalypse (Bamberg, Staatsbibliothek, MS A. II. 42)
“For Elohim, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” is the One who has shone in our hearts for the enlightening of the knowledge of the esteem of Elohim in the face of יהושע Messiah. And we have this treasure in earthen vessels, so that the excellence of the power might be of Elohim, and not of us – being hard pressed on every side,1 but not crushed; being perplexed, but not in despair; Footnote: 1See 1:8. being persecuted, but not forsaken; being thrown down, but not destroyed; always bearing about in the body the dying of the Master יהושע, that the life of יהושע might also be manifested in our body. For we, the living, are always delivered to death for the sake of יהושע, that the life of יהושע might also be manifested in our mortal flesh, so that death indeed is working in us, but the life in you. But having the same spirit of belief, according to what has been written, “I believed, therefore I spoke,” we also believe, therefore we also speak, knowing that He who raised up the Master יהושע shall also raise us up through יהושע, and shall present us with you. For all this is for your sake, so that favour, having spread through the many, would cause thanksgiving to overflow, unto the esteem of Elohim.” (2 Corinthians 4:6-15 The Scriptures 1998+)
°°°
*****
+
Please do also find Related articles:
- Secret or public return of Jesus
- Preexistence in the Divine purpose and Trinity
- Pre-existence
- Pre-existence of Christ
- The Nature of Preexistence in the New Testament
- Some issues relating to the pre-existence of Christ
- Around pre-existence of Christ
- Pre-existence of Christ #1 Intro #1 Athanasian Creed
- Da Vinci Code: Was Jesus Human or Divine?
- The Countdown to Jesus his return has begun. But Are you ready?
- The return of Christ to the earth – soon!: PDF Christ is Coming
- Bible Teaching About His Return
- New Testament Teaching
- Other New Testament Writings
- Old Testament Teaching
- The Kingdom of God
- Behold Your King!
- Dual Fulfillment
- The Times and Seasons
- Antichrist
- Tribulation
- The Nation of Sign
- The “Rapture”
- The Lord will Come!
- Take Heed to Yourselves
It was once fashionable in religious circles to say that Jesus Christ would never return to the earth. There are still plenty of professing Christians who believe that. But there are now many others who have come to believe that the Second Coming is a very important event.
Christadelphians have always taught that the Return of Jesus Christ to the earth is vital to the fulfillment of the purpose of God. This booklet reviews Bible teaching about the Second Coming, both the events that will lead up to that miracle and the reason for the Lord’s Return. - Is the Trinity or pre-existence true? > How is Jesus Christ God?
Jesus, who came into existence as a man, is the firstborn of God’s new creation as Adam was the firstborn of the old creation. (1Corinthians 15:22: “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive…. 45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made (by resurrection from the dead) a quickening spirit.”; Romans 5:19 “For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.”)
Christ’s genealogy through Mary in Luke is taken right back to Adam. (Luke 3:38: “Which was (the son) of Enos, which was (the son) of Seth, which was (the son) of Adam, which was (the son) of God.”) If Christ was to be the offspring of Abraham he had to come into being after Abraham. Abraham knew there was a saviour promised in Genesis 3:15. - Conclusion in who is Jesus Christ?Jesus did not physically exist before he was born of Mary.
1Peter 1:20 Who verily was foreordained (Greek proginoskw foreknown) before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,
It is the same word as that used of all who will be sons (and daughters) of God.Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow (Greek proginoskw foreknow), he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
The same word is used in Acts 26:5 (knew); Romans 11:2 (foreknew);2Peter 3:17 (know these things before).His pre-existence being only in the sense that he existed in the plan and purpose of God before the creation of the world.
- Certainty in a troubled world
- Looking forward to the return of Jesus
- Why did Christ not reveal the exact time of his second coming?
- Summary on trinity
- Rapture exposed
++
+++
Related articles
- Jesus begotten Son of God #6 Anointed Son of God, Adam and Abraham (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #7 A matter of the Future (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #9 Two millennia ago conceived or begotten (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #11 Existence and Genesis Raising up (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #13 Pre-existence excluding virginal birth of the Only One Transposed (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #14 Beloved Preminent Son and Mediator originating in Mary (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #15 Son of God Originating in Mary (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #16 Prophet to be heard (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #12 Son of God (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
Jesus begotten Son of God #19 Compromising fact
Forgoing article: #18 Believing in inhuman or human person
The Anointed begotten Son of God
43. A compromising fact
The Holy Trinity is more usually depicted with God the Father as an elder, God the Son as Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit as a divine Dove, as in Fridolin Leiber’s other work + The persons of the trinity are identified by symbols on their chests: The Son has a lamb (agnus dei), the Father an Eye of Providence, and the Spirit a dove.
““And this is everlasting life, that they should know You, the only true Elohim, and יהושע Messiah whom You have sent.” (John 17:3 The Scriptures 1998+)
““How are you able to believe, when you are receiving esteem from one another, and the esteem that is from the only Elohim you do not seek?” (John 5:44 The Scriptures 1998+)
“And one of the scribes coming near, hearing them reasoning together, knowing that He had answered them well, asked Him, “Which is the first command of all?” And יהושע answered him, “The first of all the commands is, ‘Hear, O Yisra’ĕl, יהוה our Elohim, יהוה is one. ‘And you shall love יהוה your Elohim with all your heart, and with all your being, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ This is the first command. “And the second, like it, is this, ‘You shall love your neighbour as yourself.’ There is no other command greater than these.” And the scribe said to Him, “Well said, Teacher. You have spoken the truth, for there is one Elohim, and there is no other besides Him.” (Mark 12:28-32 The Scriptures 1998+)
Several other “adjustments” became necessary under the revised doctrine of God. John was made to say in certain other verses what he did not say. This trend is well illustrated by the New International Version in John 13:3, 16:28 and 20:17.
“Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under his power, and that he had come from God and was returning to God;” (John 13:3 NIV)

Ascension of Christ – Giotto di Bondone (1267-1337), Cappella Scrovegni a Padova
“I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”” (John 16:28 NIV)
“Jesus said, “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet returned to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, ‘I am returning to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’”” (John 20:17 NIV)
In none of these passages does the original say that Jesus was going back to God. In the first two Jesus spoke of his intention to “go to the Father” and in the last of his “ascending” to his Father. The NIV embellishes the story by telling us that Jesus was going back or returning to God. A Son whose existence is traced to his mother’s womb cannot go back to the Father, since he has never before been with the Father. Jesus also does not go to a place where he was before as God, to be God again, but he goes “to” his Father to be “with” his Father.
“יהושע, knowing that the Father had given all into His hands, and that He had come from Elohim and was going to Elohim,” (John 13:3 The Scriptures 1998+)
““I came forth from the Father and have come into the world. Again, I leave the world and go to the Father.” “ (John 16:28 The Scriptures 1998+)
“יהושע said to her, “Do not hold on to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father. But go to My brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My Elohim and your Elohim.’ ” (John 20:17 The Scriptures 1998+)
+
Preceding article: Jesus begotten Son of God #18 Believing in inhuman or human person
To be continued: Before and After (Parts 44 + 45)
++
- Not sure there exist a god
- Hashem השם, Hebrew for “the Name”
- Monothelitism
- Monotheism: Christelijke monotheïsten
- Reasons that Jesus was not God
- Concerning gospelfaith
- Only one God
- God is one
- God of gods
- How the Coctrine of the Trinity came to the Church or How the Doctrine of the Trinity came to the Church
- How did the Trinity Doctrine Develop
- Historical Development of Trinity
- Summary on trinity
- Trinity function
- Trinity versus Tritheism
- Why the trinity was accepted in Europe
- The Trinity – the truth
- Preexistence in the Divine purpose and Trinity
- For those who have not the rudiments of an historical sense
- How do trinitarians equate divine nature
- 2 Corinthians 5:19 – God in Christ
- One mediator
- Is the Trinity a Biblical Doctrine? + What is the Trinity? + The Father is the Only True God > Restoration Light
- Who is Jesus #1 Introduction
- Who is Jesus #2 Jesus Christ, man who died
- Who is Jesus #4 Clear statements that our heavenly Father is his “God”
- Who is Jesus #6 Jesus prays to God
- Who is Jesus #8 Father greater than Jesus
- Who is Jesus #9 100% or not
- Who is Jesus #12 Conclusion
- Pre-existence of Christ
- Resurrection of Jesus Christ
- Knowing rabboni
- Da Vinci Code: Was Jesus Human or Divine?
- The Pagan Influence of The catholic church ……The Pagan Trinity, and Saint B
- Our relationship with God, Jesus and each other
- Admittance with Christ
- Gathering with Jesus
- Sayings around God
+++
Related articles
- Have You Seen the Face of God? (lbbfchurch.wordpress.com)
Ever since His ascension into heaven, after His resurrection, Jesus has been exalted in glory. He has received even a greater glory because of His obedience to the Father’s will. As recorded in John 17, Jesus prayer to the Father was that He might again enter into this visible glory of heaven. - Jesus begotten Son of God #12 Son of God (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #18 Believing in inhuman or human person (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Firstfruits and the Final Harvest (eudoranachand.wordpress.com)
In the Tanakh, a cloud often expresses God’s glory. Daniel prophesied that he saw in a night vision (a dream) the second coming of Jesus, One like the Son of Man, Coming with the clouds of heaven. He came to the Ancient of Days, And they brought Him near before Him. - A Former Pastor Warns: Leave the Church! Part 4 (endtimeebooklibrary.com)
Two books, “The Fake Jesus” and “The New Idolatry” detail historical proof that God was not the founder of the organized church. Yet for many centuries, His longsuffering and mercy endured. Both books historically connect the dots.
The book “Come Out of her, God’s People,” provides a detailed account of his memoirs as a pastor and an evangelist in a well-known African-American Denomination. - The Orthodox Definition of the Trinity (compasschurchamman.wordpress.com)
Simply stated: “The Trinity is three persons (personae) in one substance (substantia).”
“We worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; neither confounding the persons, nor dividing the substance.” – The Athanasian Creed - What is a Modalist? (zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com)
There really are three (and they don’t just seem to be three or appear from time to time in different manifestations as suits the moment) who really are one. It’s a mystery that can’t be grasped by finite minds but the ability to grasp truth isn’t the final arbiter of reality. - Salvation in Islam (part 2 of 3): Worship and Obey God (aroonadorough.wordpress.com)
Tawheed is an Arabic word that means oneness, and when we talk about tawheed in relation to God it means realising and affirming God’s oneness. It is the belief that God is One, without partner or associate. There is no god worthy of worship but Allah, and this is the foundation of Islam. To profess such a belief along with the belief that Muhammad is His messenger is what makes a person Muslim. - Monotheism – One God (aroonadorough.wordpress.com)
The religion of Islam is based on one core belief, that there is no god worthy of worship but Allah. When a person embraces Islam or a Muslim wants to renew or confirm his or her faith, they profess their belief that there is no god worthy of worship but Allah and that Muhammad is His final messenger. Ashadu an la ill laha il Allah wa Ashadu anna Muhammadan Rasulullah, Saying these words, the Testimony of Faith, is the first of five pillars or foundations of the religion of Islam. Belief in God is the first of six pillars of faith. - Names of God in Judaism: EMET excerpt selected by אלוה אל (powersthatbeat.wordpress.com)
The most important name of God in Judaism is the Tetragrammaton, the four-letter name of God. This name is first mentioned in the book of Genesis and is usually translated as ’the Lord’. Because Jews have for a longperiod of time considered it blasphemy to pronounce, the correct pronunciation of this name has been forgotten—the original Hebrew texts only included consonants.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )
Jesus begotten Son of God #17 Adam, Eve, Mary and Christianity’s central figure
Jesus begotten son of God
39. Adam and Eve, Mary and Jesus
As the ‘mannin’ Eve, who was created after the image of God, became the first mother of the 1st worldgeneration, Mary was chosen to be the mother of the 2nd Adam, who was going to be the 1st of the New Generation (The third in a row). [35. The 2nd one having started after the flood.] This new child, or the child of the new beginning (Genesis) had to come directly from God to be likewise the 1st Adam and because it would have been unfair to start off from a person who would only come from fragile humans who , because of the heridarity of defects, should have to many problems to choose not to sin. The new world had to be able to start without a bug, so giving humanity more chances to succeed the Creator took again a woman, who at first [36. Eve in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3)] had showed a deceit, giving her again the chance to bring up good children.

The birth of Christ Jesus - La Nativité - 1490 Lorenzo Costa (1460–1535) Museum of Fine Arts of Lyon
40. Identity and nature of Christianity’s central figure
As the centre of a new ecumenism the simple truth about the identity and nature of Christianity’s central figure has the backing of those many scholars who know well that neither Luke nor Matthew show any sign of believing in a pre-human eternal Son of God of the post-biblical creeds. Raymond Brown’s magisterial treatment of the birth narratives in his Birth of the Messiah makes a major point of the fact that neither Matthew nor Luke believed in the Incarnation of a pre-human, prehistoric Son.
Commenting on Luke 1:35, “therefore,” Raymond Brown says, “of the nine times dio kai occurs in the New Testament, three are in Luke/Acts. It involves a certain causality and Lyonnet (in his L’Annonciation, 61.6) points out that this has embarrassed many orthodox theologians since in pre-existence Christology a conception by the holy spirit in Mary’s womb does not bring about the existence of God’s son. Luke is seemingly unaware of such a Christology; conception is causally related to divine Sonship for him…And so I cannot follow those theologians who try to avoid the causal connotation in the ‘therefore’ which begins this line, by arguing that for Luke the conception of the child does not bring the Son of God into being.” Raymond Brown insists that according to Luke, “We are dealing with the begetting of God’s Son in the womb of Mary through God’s creative spirit.” [37. The Birth of the Messiah, London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1977, pp. 291, 312.]
“Orthodoxy” derived from later Church Councils has to turn a blind eye to Gabriel’s definition of the Son of God. It contradicted Gabriel by denying that the conception of Jesus brought about his existence as Son of God.
This is a very serious issue. Is the Jesus of the creeds, the Jesus under whose umbrella churches gather, really the created Son authorized by Scripture in Luke 1:35 and Matthew 1:18, 20?
Again, the exhaustive work of Brown on the birth narratives brings us the important fact that the Jesus of the Gospels is quite unlike the “eternally begotten” Son of the later creeds:
“Matthew and Luke press [the question of Jesus’ identity] back to Jesus’ conception. In the commentary I shall stress that Matthew and Luke show no knowledge of pre-existence; seemingly for them the conception was the becoming (begetting) of God’s Son (p. 31).”
“The fact that Matthew can speak of Jesus as ‘begotten’ (passive of gennan) suggests that for him the conception through the agency of the holy spirit is the becoming of God’s Son. [In Matthew’s and Luke’s ‘conception Christology’] God’s creative action in the conception of Jesus begets Jesus as God’s Son…There is no suggestion of an Incarnation whereby a figure who was previously with God takes on flesh. For pre-existence Christology [Incarnation], the conception of Jesus is the beginning of an earthly career but not the begetting of God’s Son. [Later] the virginal conception was no longer seen as the begetting of God’s Son, but as the incarnation of God’s Son, and that became orthodox Christian doctrine. This thought process is probably already at work at the beginning of the second century” (pp. 140-142).
+
Preceding article: Jesus begotten Son of God #16 Prophet to be heard
To be continued: 41. What to believe + 42. Inhuman
++
Who is Jesus Christ? #1 What does the Bible say the only man who is called “the Last Adam” , the only man who was ever born of a virgin
Preexistence in the Divine purpose and Trinity
Around pre-existence of Christ
Pre-existence of Christ #1 Intro #1 Athanasian Creed
+++
Related articles
- Luke 22:66-71 (biblestudy123.wordpress.com)
Son of man seated at the right hand - Jesus begotten Son of God #6 Anointed Son of God, Adam and Abraham (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #8 Found Divinely Created not Incarnated (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #11 Existence and Genesis Raising up (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #13 Pre-existence excluding virginal birth of the Only One Transposed (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #14 Beloved Preminent Son and Mediator originating in Mary (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #15 Son of God Originating in Mary (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #16 Prophet to be heard (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
Jesus begotten Son of God #16 Prophet to be heard
The Anointed begotten Son of God
38. The Prophet to be heard
A prophet is a spokesman of a deity, one who proclaims a divine message. He is also an inspired teacher, preacher or poet. It is a foreteller (whether claiming to be inspired or not.) (32)
From the beginning God has given humankind His Word which was with them all the time by the word and writingsof the chosen men and prophets.
Jesus was also a prophet or chosen man of God. He was here on earth to teach religion, to give directions how we have to behave. He told us who his Father was and who our heavenly Father is. He also told us who we have to honour and pray to. He taught by parables or illustrations which could give us an idea what was going to happen. As a teacher he brought not exactly a new theory but summarised the old one, bringing a new cause. (33) As a Jew he taught first at the Jewish communities but his words where brought in the open air as well for all who wanted to listen. But God wanted us to listen to His son.
“While he was yet speaking, behold a bright cloud overshadowed them; and behold a voice from the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; hear him.” (Matthew 17:5 Sawyer)
Jesus disciples went out to tell people about the happenings of this man they got to know better, and wrote down his history in the books we now know as the New Testament. Those who want to be a Christian should listen to those words in those books because they are words form the disciples of Christ Jesus and the words of Jeshua/Jesus and his Father. Not taking up these words is not listening to the disciples who were there to see and to believe. Not listening to those writings would therefore also be not listening to their Master Teacher Jesus Christ, the Messiah who was sent by his and our Father, and as such be a rejecting of this Father. By Jesus the prophecy of Isaiah is continuously being filled up in (or: for; by) them – the one continuing. Christ did not please himself, but did everything to please his Father, even at the moment he knew he was going to be handed over to die. (34)
““Therefore everyone who hears these words of Mine, and does them, shall be like a wise man who built his house on the rock,” “ (Matthew 7:24 The Scriptures 1998+) + ““And everyone who hears these words of Mine, and does not do them,1 shall be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand,” {Footnote: 1John 3:36.} “ (Matthew 7:26 The Scriptures 1998+)
““He who has ears to hear, let him hear!” And the taught ones came and said to Him, “Why do You speak to them in parables?” And He answering, said to them, “Because it has been given to you to know the secrets of the reign of the heavens, but to them it has not been given. “For whoever possesses, to him more shall be given, and he shall have overflowingly; but whoever does not possess, even what he possesses shall be taken away from him. “Because of this I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand. “And in them the prophecy of Yeshayahu is completely filled, which says, ‘Hearing you shall hear and by no means understand, and seeing you shall see and by no means perceive, for the heart of this people has become thickened, and their ears are hard of hearing, and their eyes they have closed, lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, lest they should understand with their heart, and turn back, and I heal them.’ “And blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear, for truly I say to you, that many prophets and righteous ones longed to see what you see, and did not see it, and to hear what you hear, and did not hear it.” (Matthew 13:9-17 The Scriptures 1998+)
““He who hears you hears Me, he who rejects you rejects Me, and he who rejects Me rejects Him who sent Me.” “ (Luke 10:16 The Scriptures 1998+)
“And when He had come to His own country, He taught them in their congregation, so that they were astonished and said, “Where did this One get this wisdom and miracles? “Is this not the son of the carpenter? Is not His mother called Miryam? And His brothers Ya’aqoḇ and Yosĕph and Shim’on and Yehuḏah? “And His sisters, are they not all with us? Where then did this One get all this?” And they stumbled at Him. But יהושע said to them, “A prophet is not unappreciated except in his own country and in his own house.” “ (Matthew 13:54-57 The Scriptures 1998+)
““But this is how Elohim has filled what He had announced beforehand through the mouth of all the prophets, that His Messiah was to suffer. “Repent therefore and turn back, for the blotting out of your sins, in order that times of refreshing might come from the presence of the Master, and that He sends יהושע Messiah, pre-appointed for you, whom heaven needs to receive until the times of restoration of all matters, of which Elohim spoke through the mouth of all His set-apart prophets since of old. “For Mosheh truly said to the fathers, ‘יהוה your Elohim shall raise up for you a Prophet like me from your brothers. Him you shall hear according to all matters, whatever He says to you. ‘And it shall be that every being who does not hear that Prophet1 shall be utterly destroyed from among the people.’ Footnote: 1Deut. 18:18-20. “And likewise, all the prophets who have spoken, from Shemu’ĕl and those following, have also announced these days. “You are sons of the prophets, and of the covenant which Elohim made with our fathers, saying to Aḇraham, ‘And in your seed all the nations of the earth shall be blessed.’ “To you first, Elohim, having raised up His Servant יהושע, sent Him to bless you, in turning away each one of you from your wicked ways.”1 Footnote: 1See 2:38. “(Acts 3:18-26 The Scriptures 1998+)
“For even the Messiah did not please Himself, but, as it has been written, “The reproaches of those who reproached You fell upon Me.” For whatever was written before was written for our instruction,1 that through endurance and encouragement of the Scriptures we might have the expectation. Footnote: 11 Cor. 10:11, 2 Tim. 3:16-17. And the Elohim of endurance and encouragement give you to be of the same mind toward one another, according to Messiah יהושע, that with one mind and one mouth, you might praise the Elohim and Father of our Master יהושע Messiah. So accept one another, as Messiah also did accept us, to the esteem of Elohim. And I say that יהושע Messiah has become a servant of the circumcised for the truth of Elohim, to confirm the promises made to the fathers, and for the gentiles to praise Elohim for His compassion, as it has been written, “Because of this I shall confess to You among the gentiles, and I shall sing to Your Name.” “ (Romans 15:3-9 The Scriptures 1998+)
~~~~
32. Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary
33. Compare the meaning of prophet given by the Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English, 2nd Edition p 717
34. “And He withdrew from them about a stone’s throw, and falling on His knees He was praying, saying, “Father, if it be Your counsel, remove this cup from Me. Yet not My desire, but let Yours be done.” And there appeared a messenger from heaven to Him, strengthening Him. And being in agony, He was praying more earnestly. And His sweat became like great drops of blood falling down to the ground.” (Luke 22:41-44 The Scriptures 1998+)
+
Preceding article: Jesus begotten Son of God #15 Son of God Originating in Mary
To be continued: 39. Adam and Eve, Mary and Jesus + 40. Identity and nature of Christianity’s central figure
+++
Related articles
- Jesus begotten Son of God #7 A matter of the Future (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- A Survey of the Book of the New Testament (compasschurchamman.wordpress.com)
The Gospels give us four different, yet not conflicting, accounts of the birth, life, ministry, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The Gospels demonstrate how Jesus was the promised Messiah of the Old Testament and lay the foundation for the teaching of the rest of the New Testament.
Jesus begotten Son of God #15 Son of God Originating in Mary
The Anointed begotten Son of God
36. Originating in Mary
From the nativity story to the story of the beginning of Jesus ‘public life we see the line of the human link and often we also shall get to see the fragility of the Master Teacher, who sometimes got tired of the human crowd around him.
The whole story is ruined if another dimension is added to the story, namely that the Son of God was already a pre-existing member of an eternal Trinity. Gabriel has carefully defined the nature of Jesus’ Sonship and his words exclude any origin other than a supernatural origin in Mary.
Gabriel’s Jesus, Son of God — the biblical Son — originates in Mary. He is conceived and begotten by miracle. In pre-existence Christology, the main plank of Trinitarianism, a conception/begetting in Mary’s womb does not bring about the existence of God’s Son. According to Gabriel it does. Neither Gabriel nor Luke could possibly have been Trinitarians.
No need for centuries of complex wrangling over words. All that is required is belief of the angelic communication: “For this reason precisely (dio kai) — the creative miracle of God through His divine power — the child will be Son of God.” For no other reason, for this reason only. (Note the very watered-down rendering of the NIV, “so the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God.”)
37. Son of the Most High
Jesus as Son of God is “the Son of the Most High”.
“He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God shall give Him the throne of His father David.” (Luke 1:32 Complete Apostles’ Bible)
Clearly there is also written in the future sense. In case Jesus already existed, being God, he would be the Most High and therefore would be more than Great. God has been sitting on the throne form the beginning and in case Jesus was God he would have already been sitting on the throne as well and would have had already the throne of David. He also would not have David as his forefather, because David would be a great great-grandson.(30)
We also should question “What have you to do with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God?”
“And when he saw יהושע, he cried out, fell down before Him, and with a loud voice said, “What have I to do with You, יהושע, Son of the Most High Elohim? I beg You, do not torture me!”” (Luke 8:28 The Scriptures 1998+)
Though we may also be children of God by the grace of Jesus Christ, heirs’ heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, but we shall have to work very hard to become like Christ, as is one of our tasks given by the Master Teacher and his disciples. We as Christ Jesus shall have to come to live according the Spirit, in the spirit instead of in the flesh, as Jesus was in the Spirit and from the Spirit. In such a way only by submitting to God’s law, not being in the flesh we shall be able to please God. As the Spirit of Goddwelled in Jesus it should also dwell in us. And being led by the Spirit of God we are sons of God in the same way that Jesus is son of God. The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God. (31)
“For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the matters of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit, the matters of the Spirit. For the mind of the flesh is death, but the mind of the Spirit is life and peace. Because the mind of the flesh is enmity towards Elohim, for it does not subject itself1 to the Torah of Elohim2, neither indeed is it able, {Footnotes: 1Or does not obey. 2John 15:5, 1 John 4:4, 1 John 3:9, 1 John 5:18.} and those who are in the flesh are unable to please Elohim. But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of Elohim dwells in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Messiah, this one is not His. And if Messiah is in you, the body is truly dead on account of sin, but the Spirit is life on account of righteousness. And if the Spirit of Him who raised יהושע from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Messiah from the dead shall also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit dwelling in you. So then, brothers, we are not debtors to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. For if you live according to the flesh, you are going to die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you shall live. For as many as are led by the Spirit of Elohim, these are sons of Elohim. For you did not receive the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption by whom we cry out, “Abba, Father.” The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of Elohim, and if children, also heirs – truly heirs of Elohim, and co-heirs with Messiah, if indeed we suffer with Him, in order that we also be exalted together. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the esteem that is to be revealed in us. For the intense longing1 of the creation eagerly waits for the revealing of the sons of Elohim. {Footnote: 1Lit. anxiously looking with outstretched head.} For the creation was subjected to futility, not from choice, but because of Him who subjected it, in anticipation, that the creation itself also shall be delivered from the bondage to corruption into the esteemed freedom of the children of Elohim.” (Romans 8:5-21 The Scriptures 1998+)
Let us therefore know and understand, not walking in darkness but recognize the person to whom Jesus prayed and whom he adored and called Him his Father. As David and Jesus said that the Creator of all things was their Father, we also should say: “you are Elohim, and sons of the Supreme are all of you.” Yet we know we shall die like common humanity, most likely in a better way than Jesus died. Though Jesus never did do anything wrong but poor us we do know we are too weak to be totally like Christ, without any fault, with whom we have to be in unity.
“They do not know, nor do they understand, They walk about in darkness. All the foundations of the earth are shaken. I, I said, “You are elohim, And all of you are sons of the Most High. “But as men you die, And fall as one of the heads.” “ (Psalms 82:5-7 The Scriptures 1998+)
“My little children, I write this to you, so that you do not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Intercessor with the Father, יהושע Messiah, a righteous One. And He Himself is an atoning offering for our sins, and not for ours only but also for all the world. And by this we know that we know Him, if we guard His commands.1{Footnote: 1See 3:6}. The one who says, “I know Him,” and does not guard His commands, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoever guards His Word, truly the love of Elohim has been perfected1 in him. By this we know that we are in Him.2 {Footnotes: 1Gen. 17:1, Ps. 119:1, Mt. 5:48. 2See 3:24.} The one who says he stays in Him ought himself also to walk, even as He walked. Beloved, I write no fresh command to you, but an old command which you have had from the beginning. The old command is the Word which you heard from the beginning.1 {Footnote: 1See v. 24.} (1 John 2:1-7 The Scriptures 1998+)
*
Note (30): But see who is the great-grandson: “He (Jesus) will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give him the throne of his forefather David.” (Luke 1:32 ISV)
(31): “The spirit itself is testifying together with our spirit that we are children of God.” (Romans 8:16 CLV)
+
Preceding article: Jesus begotten Son of God #14 Beloved Preminent Son and Mediator originating in Mary
To be continued: The Prophet to be heard
+++
Related articles
- Jesus begotten Son of God #7 A matter of the Future (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #8 Found Divinely Created not Incarnated (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #9 Two millennia ago conceived or begotten (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #10 Coming down spirit or flesh seed of Eve (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #12 Son of God (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #13 Pre-existence excluding virginal birth of the Only One Transposed (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- Jesus begotten Son of God #14 Beloved Preminent Son and Mediator originating in Mary (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
Jesus begotten Son of God #13 Pre-existence excluding virginal birth of the Only One Transposed
The Anointed begotten Son of God
29. The only one
Though Jesus came into life by becoming into the womb, and getting onto the world by getting out of the womb of the human being Miryam/Mary he was implanted in her in a special way. You could compare it with fertilisation by insemination by the Holy Spirit.
When there took place a fertilisation there would have been a conception, fecundation or syngamy. As fertilisation is the fusion of gametes to produce a new organism in Marya new organism was created by the Holy Spirit.Because by Mary there was no process involving the fusion of an ovum with a sperm, which eventually leads to the development of an embryo it was an exceptional conceivement. For Mary it was her first child. Afterwards she got some other kids from a normal contact with her then husband Joseph with whom she according one of the Laws of God reproduced.
‘Conception’ is used by some to refer to implantation and is thus a subject of semantic arguments about the beginning of pregnancy, typically in the context of the abortion debate. With Mary there was a conception, an implantation by the Holy Spirit or “by the Working of God”, a conceivement
Remarkably there is the confirmation of the virginal begetting in John 1:13, if we read the Jerusalem Bible and translations like Albrecht’s German rendering of the Greek in 1920. The issue is the singular aorist verb here (egenneethee).
“not because of bloodline, physical impulse or human intention, but because of god.” (John 1:13 CJB)
„13 Nicht aus Geblüt der Menschen, auch nicht aus Fleischestrieb und Manneswillen, vielmehr durch Gottes Wirksamkeit ward er gezeugt.*n13.1 „ (John 1:13 Albr)
If that text is original, then it is the singular Son of God who “was begotten, not of the will of the flesh or male desire, but of God.” It is surely rather labored and strange to contrast our “rebirth” with the birth by male desire, flesh, etc. Much more natural is an easy reference to the virginal begetting of Jesus. He is then the uniquely begotten Son (monogenes) precisely because that is what he really was, uniquely brought into existence as Son.
“no one has ever seen god; but the only and unique son, who is identical with god and is at the father’s side—he has made him known.” (John 1:18 CJB)
If the conceived one in Mary is Jeshua or Jesus, he is the uniquely begotten one who could be identical with “God” because he was partly from God and partly from a human being, Mary. Being implanted by God he would be a very special person and between the many gods of the world he could receive a special position as a “god”, but that is not the same as being God, making two Gods. Being created in a special way Jesus became the highest form of created being, as Hort noted in his long dissertation on that verse.
By the Word of God, God His son as the only brought-forth Son, is to be made known to the world.
“No one has seen God at any time. The only-begotten [or, unique] Son, the One in the bosom of the Father, that One explained [Him] [or, made [Him] known]. “ (John 1:18 ALT)
30. Pre-existence and virginal birth exclude each other
Virgin Mary and infant Jesus on wall and dove of Holy Spirit and pagan symbols of the four Evangelists on ceiling – Italian Chapel, Lamb Holm, Orkney, Scotland
It was Harnack who observed that “pre-existence and virginal birth self-evidently exclude each other” (schliessen sich aus).
There is more. In the LXX of Psalm 110:3 we read the same “Today I have begotten you,” in the ruling Messianic psalm which controls the thinking of the New Testament. Psalm 110:1 is quoted massively more than any other verse from the Hebrew Bible.
“יהוה said to my Master, “Sit at My right hand, Until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet.” יהוה sends Your mighty sceptre out of Tsiyon. Rule in the midst of Your enemies! Your people volunteer in the day of Your might, In the splendours of set-apartness! From the womb, from the morning, You have the dew of Your youth! יהוה has sworn and does not relent, “You are a priest forever According to the order of Malkitseḏeq.” יהוה at Your right hand Shall smite sovereigns in the day of His wrath. “ (Psalms 110:1-5 The Scriptures 1998+)
“Jehovah will {1} send forth the {2} rod of thy strength out of Zion: Rule thou in the midst of thine enemies. {1) Or [stretch] 2) Or [sceptre]} Thy people {1} offer themselves willingly In the day of thy {2} power, {3} in holy array: Out of the womb of the morning {4} Thou hast the dew of thy youth. {1) Heb [are freewill-offerings] 2) Or [army] 3) Or [in the beauty of holiness] 4) Or [Thy youth are to thee] as [the dew]}” (Psalms 110:2-3 ASV)
It is out of the womb that the sending of the promised one shall come.
The rod of David’s strength shall be send out of Zion and “more than the womb of the morning”[1] Messiah shall come to sit at YHVH the Only One God Jehovah’s right hand until his enemies are subjected to him.
That Son of God is the one begotten by the Father in the LXX of verse 3. Though the Masoretic text has repointed the Hebrew to read “your youth” (yaldutecha) many Hebrew manuscripts and the Hebrew version read by Origen read “I have begotten you” (yeliditicha), exactly as in Psalm 2:7 “I have begotten you.” (All this is just like substituting “shipping” for “shopping” “skyping” for “scoping.”)
““I inscribe for a law: יהוה has said to Me, ‘You are My Son, Today I have brought You forth. “ (Psalms 2:7 The Scriptures 1998+)
Psalm 2:7 indicating that the person is “brought forth” or “birthed”[2] is clearly key as is 2 Samuel 7:14, not to mention Isaiah 7:14: “To us [in Israel] has been born or begotten a Son.”
“I will declare shall scribe the decree statute : the LORD Yah Veh hath said unto me, Thou art my Son Ben * ; this day have I begotten birthed thee. {*Ben: cp 2:12 } (Psalms 2:7 ERRB)
“I will shall be his for him, father, and he shall be my for me, son. If he commit iniquity pervert , I will chasten shall reprove him with the rod scion of men, and with the stripes plagues of the children sons of men humanity : “ (2 Samuel 7:14 ERRB)
“Therefore the Lord Adonay himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear birth a son, and shall call his name Immanuel Immanu El . “ (Isaiah 7:14 ERRB)
And in Hebrews 7:14 we know that our Lord is “descended from Judah.”
“For it is evident hath been preevidenced that our Lord sprang Adonay rose out of Juda Yah Hudah ; of unto which tribe scion Moses Mosheh spake nothing naught concerning priesthood. {Genesis 49:8, 10 } “ (Hebrews 7:14 ERRB)
In three groups of 14’s Matthew (ch. 1) lays out the complete family history of the Son of God, who later as “ideal Israel” is called out of Egypt (2:15). Jesus then gives us, as the ideal Moses, the five blocks of New Covenant teaching, each ending with the “chorus” “when Jesus had finished all these words.”
How could anyone imagine “God the Son” being the promised “prophet arising as one like Moses and from the family of Israel” (Deut. 18:15-18)? Israel had asked not to hear God speak directly to them, and God conceded. How bizarre if then a “GOD the Son” spoke to them having abandoned a life of eternity in heaven to walk on earth with an “impersonal human nature.”
32. Transposed into Eternity
In case God incarnated in the foetus of Mary it was somebody who was and has always been who came out of Mary. This would mean that that Jesus was also eternal, in case he did not die. God can not die, being a spirit, so that comes in conflict with lots of Christian dogmatic teaching. Muslims on the other hand do not accept such an incarnation, accept Jesus as a prophetbut not as a son of God, and denied that he died. So for them Jesus had a beginning but no end.Normally in English “to die” means to become deceased or coming in a state of no longer living; being dead. The traditional believe is also that you can only die once and then you shall departure from life and be a dead person.
When a person is dead he or she will not endowed any more with life; and would be inanimate.
In case Jesus died on the cross he would have been dead: deceased, extinct, lifeless, and therefore would not have or appear to have life. Though we know that God cannot die, so when he was in Jesus when did he get out of in and who let He die? Did suddenly change the body of the God into a body of a poor man? According the Muslims the person Jeshua was interchanged for somebody else. But in the Bible this is no where recorded.
Jesus did not fake his death on the wooden stake and really came to an end, so was not eternal.
The birth date as well as the begetting of the Son of God ought never to have been transposed out of history and time into the philosophical, misty “times” of eternity.
The notion of an “eternal begetting” by which, as one church father said, the Son “had a beginningless beginning” ought to have been silenced, and Scripture allowed to speak to us all.
One architect of the Trinity admitted that the Trinity is a compromise between Jewish monotheism and pagan polytheism (Gregory of Nyssa), combining the best of two worlds! This leads people to read Philippians 2 as if Paul was on board with the Trinity of which he had never heard. Jesus was not “in very nature God” (NIV) but “in the form of God,” as God’s visible image, his glory, as the unique Son. The Son’s glory or appearance, visible, was the reflection of the One God, his Father, the God of Israel, God of gods and of the creation. As that matchless human Son, Jesus did not exploit his amazing status but worked for our good, resisting the Devil and performing perfectly as a servant leader.
That is why he has been elevated to the position of ADONI, my lord (Ps. 110:1; adoni is in all 195 occurrences a non-Deity title), at the right hand of YHVH, the One God. If Jesus were GOD in the first place then his achievement and elevation is really a charade. It is what God has done and can do with a fully dedicated human being that should make us catch our breath.
[1] “Thy people [shall be] willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth. {from…: or, more than the womb of the morning: thou shalt have, etc}” (Psalms 110:3 AVRLE)
[2] I scribe the statute! Yah Veh says to me, You are my Son/Ben*; this day I birthed you. {*Ben; cp 2:12 } “ (Psalms 2:7 ECB)
Note: Many Christians believe Jesus was incarnated by the the act of grace whereby Christ took our human nature into union with his Divine Person and became man, supposed to God becoming God Man. Those Christians believe Christ is both God and man but can not explain how it was possible that the people who saw Christ Jesus did not die when they saw him, because everybody who sees God dies (Exodus 33:20).
And יהוה said to Mosheh, “Even this word you have spoken I shall do, for you have found favour in My eyes, and I know you by name.” Then he said, “Please, show me Your esteem.” And He said, “I shall cause all My goodness to pass before you, and I shall proclaim the Name of יהוה before you. And I shall favour him whom I favour, and shall have compassion on him whom I have compassion.” But He said, “You are unable to see My face, for no man does see Me and live.” And יהוה said, “See, there is a place with Me! And you shall stand on the rock. “And it shall be, while My esteem passes by, that I shall put you in the cleft of the rock and cover you with My hand while I pass by. “Then I shall take away My hand and you shall see My back, but My face shall not be seen.”
(Exodus 33:17-23 The Scriptures 1998+)
According to the Trinitarians they take Jesus as ‘the divine God’ which is not exactly the same as ‘a divine person’ united to a human nature (Acts 20:28; Rom. 8:32; 1 Cor. 2:8; Hebrews 2:11-14; 1 Tim. 3:16; Gal. 4:4, etc.).
About the divinity Allon Maxwell says in Good-News Jesus among the partisans:” Of course mainstream theology attributes the sinless obedience of Jesus to the superior moral attributes of his alleged “divinity”. But think about it. That amounts to a serious a slander against the justice of God! What justice would there be in a God who condemned humans who were born unable to obey because of their lack of divinity? How could one ever truly love a God like that?”
We are not divine, but we can strive to get more divine. Daily we can work on our character to become a better person.
+
Preceding article: Jesus begotten Son of God #12 Son of God
To be continued: 33. Mediator + 34. Preeminent Son + 35. The beloved son
++
Read also:
- Around pre-existence of Christ
- Preexistence in the Divine purpose and Trinity
- Pre-existence of Christ #1 Look #2 Jesus in the Old Testament
- Pre-existence of Christ #1 Intro #4 Jesus – His Parents #2 Difference
- Can God become flesh? Kan God vlees worden?
- “Son of God” – “God the Son”
- Jesus was the son of “The Father” in the fullest sense as he said on numerous occasions. + We are not divine, but we can strive to get more divine. Daily we can work on our character to become a better person. > Good-News Jesus among the partisans
- Who is Jesus Christ? #1 What does the Bible say
- Dying or not
- Immortality, eternality – onsterfelijkheid, eeuwigheid
- Christian thought: acknowledge that Jesus is the Son of God
+
- Colossians 1:15-20: Preexistence or Preeminence? by William Wachtel
- The Nature of Preexistence in the New Testament or Preexistensens natur i Nya testamentet (Swedish)
- Who Is Jesus? God, or Unique Man? or Wie is Jesus? God, of Unieke Mens? (Afrikaans)
+
In Dutch:
- voorbestaan-jezus
- 18 Redenen dat Jezus niet God is.
- Redenen dat Jezus niet God is
- Afstraling van Gods heerlijkheid
- Hij die zit aan de rechterhand van Zijn Vader
- Zoon van God
- Hij die gezonden is naar de aarde
- Jezus Christus is in het vlees gekomen
- Christus Jezus: de zoon van God
- Jezus van Nazareth #1 Jezus Geboorte
- Jezus van Nazareth #2 De zoon van Maria
- Jezus van Nazareth #3 De Zoon van God
- Niet goddelijkheid van Christus toch
- Hij is de Zoon van God
- Onsterfelijkheid
+++
Related articles
- Jesus begotten Son of God #6 Anointed Son of God, Adam and Abraham (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
There are many references in the Old Testament to Jesus in the types and in the prophecies of the messiah. - Jesus begotten Son of God #7 A matter of the Future (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
Several prophesies were given in the Old Testament. A prophesy is something which is still going to happen. It does not about something what had happened in the past. - Jesus begotten Son of God #9 Two millennia ago conceived or begotten (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
According to Chambers dictionary ‘to conceive’ is to receive into or form in the womb: to form in the mind: to imagine or think: to understand: to grasp as a concept to express: to become pregnant. - Jesus begotten Son of God #8 Found Divinely Created not Incarnated (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
The Son of God of Gabriel’s announcement is none other than a divinely created Son of God, coming into existence — begotten — as Son in his mother’s womb. All other claimants to divine Sonship and Messiahship may safely be discounted.
+
God has not implanted himself in a human being. Perhaps you could say He did bring over a spark of this spirit, or immortal divinity, in a foetus through its mother. As God had created the first man he now could bring in to the woman Many elements which would bring into live a new human being, a second Adam, created as a fleshly likeness of his Creator, who is a spirit being, but that still would not make that Adam the same as its Creator. Nor would be any conceived child the same as his or her father or mother. - Jesus begotten Son of God #10 Coming down spirit or flesh seed of Eve (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
Pre-human of course implies, if you think about it, non-human. And the whole point of the Messiah, Son of God, is that he is and must be a man, “the man mediator” of the lucidly clear statement of Paul in 1 Timothy 2:5: “There is one God, and one mediator between God and man, the man Messiah Jesus,” the second Adam. - Jesus begotten Son of God #11 Existence and Genesis Raising up (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
Jesus is thus son of Eve, of Abraham, of David, of Mary and at the same time of God. As Adam was also the Son of God by divine miracle and creation (Luke 3:38), so is Jesus Son of God. “God the Son” is out of the question at once, since the only and mortal Son of God, Messiah, was “brought into existence” some 2000 years ago, at a definite and predicted geographical location. - On the Nature of Christ (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
The testimonies which teach the indivisible unity of the Deity, as the One Father, out of whom ALL things have proceeded, and who is supreme above all, even above Christ (I Cor. 11:3), are inconsistent with the Trinitarian representation of God. The supremacy and unity of the Father would not be affirmable if there were three co-equal personalities in His One personality—a doctrine which presents us with a contradiction in terms as well as in sense. - The Seed Of The Woman Bruised (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
Jesus, who was the only begotten of the Father full of grace and truth” (John 1:14), received strength that enabled him to render sinless obedience to the requirements of his Father, and manifest a character which reflected the Divine image (1 Peter2:21–24).This was necessary for the work of redemption, so that it is not solely the work of Christ, but that of the Father and the Son acting in conjunction one with the other. The Bible teaches: “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself” (2 Cor. 5:19). Jesus leaned heavily upon the Father, and God strengthened him, with the result that the fullness of the Divine character was revealed in a human body, that inherited the consequences of the first sin.
Jesus begotten Son of God #12 Son of God
The Anointed begotten Son of God
28. Son of God
In Hebrews 1:5ff three corroborating proof texts take us to the origin of the Son. 2 Samuel 7:14 reinforces Psalm 2:7 and speaks of the moment when God becomes the Father of Jesus the Son (“I will be his father and he will my son”). This is equally the moment when Jesus comes into the world, is brought into the world, i.e. is born.
“For to which of the messengers did He ever say, “You are My Son, today I have brought You forth”?1 And again, “I shall be to Him a Father, and He shall be to Me a Son”?2 {Footnotes: 1Ps. 2:7. 22 Sa. 7:14.} And when He again brings the first-born into the world, He says, “Let all the messengers of Elohim do reverence to Him.” And of the messengers indeed He says, “… who is making His messengers spirits and His servants a flame of fire.” But to the Son He says, “Your throne, O Elohim, is forever and ever, a sceptre of straightness is the sceptre of Your reign. “You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness. Because of this, Elohim, Your Elohim, has anointed You with the oil of gladness more than Your companions.” “ (Hebrews 1:5-9 The Scriptures 1998+)
““I inscribe for a law: יהוה has said to Me, ‘You are My Son, Today I have brought You forth. “ (Psalms 2:7 The Scriptures 1998+)
““I am to be his Father, and he is My son. If he does perversely, I shall reprove him with the rod of men and with the blows of the sons of men.” (2 Samuel 7:14 The Scriptures 1998+)
In the New Testament we do find written down that Jesus spoke of his own coming into the world (“to this end I was born,” see John 18:37) and we know when that was. He was made holy and sent into the world (John 10:36), which is an echo of Gabriel in Luke. “The one begotten (brought into existence) holy will be the Son of God.”
“Then Pilate said to Him, “So then, You are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. For this [reason] I have been born, and for this [reason] I have come into the world, so that I should testify to the truth. Every [one] being of the truth hears My voice.” “ (John 18:37 ALT)
Jesus is been born and as for any other being that has been born he came into existence and came into the world.
And it occurred, when all the people were baptized, that Yeshua/Jesus also was baptized. And as he prayed, the heavens were opened; and the Holy Spirit descended upon him, in the bodily likeness of a dove: and there was a voice from heaven, which said: “You are my beloved Son, in whom I have delight.” And Yeshua was about thirty years old. Then the New Testament gives us his family tree and lets us know that he was accounted the son of Yoseph/Joseph, who was the son of Heli, and in that lineage we could fine Levi and the prophets Amos, Nahum, several Yudahs/Juda, Yosephs, Nathan, the son of David, son of Boaz, son of Salmon, to come by the son of Yitzchak/Isaac, son of Avraham/Abraham/Aram, son of Terach/Thara, via the son of Shem, son of Noakh/Noach/Noah/Noe, son of Lamech, to the son of Methuselah/Mathusala, son of Enokh/Enoch, to come to the son of Yared/Jared, son of Mehalaleel/Maleleel, the son of Cainan, the son of Enos, so to the son of Seth, son of Adam, the son of Alaha[1] the Allah Elohim Hashem or Most High God Jehovah.“And it came to be, when all the people were immersed, יהושע also being immersed, and praying, the heaven was opened, and the Set-apart Spirit descended in bodily form like a dove upon Him, and a voice came from heaven saying, “You are My Son, the Beloved, in You I did delight.” And when יהושע Himself began, He was about thirty years of age, being, as reckoned by law, son of Yosĕph, of Ěli, of Mattithyahu, of Lĕwi, of Meleḵi, of Yanah, of Yosĕph, of Mattithyahu, of Amots, of Naḥum, of Ḥesli, of Noḡah, of Ma’ath, of Mattithyahu, of Shim’i, of Yosĕph, of Yehuḏah, of Yoḥanan, of Rephayah, of Zerubbaḇel, of She’alti’ĕl, of Neri, of Meleḵi, of Addi, of Qosam, of Elmoḏam, of Ěr, of Yehoshua, of Eli’ezer, of Yorim, of Mattithyahu, of Lĕwi, of Shim’on, of Yehuḏah, of Yosĕph, of Yonam, of Elyaqim, of Melea, of Menna, of Mattattah, of Nathan, of Dawiḏ, of Yishai, of Oḇĕḏ, of Bo’az, of Salmon, of Naḥshon, of Amminaḏaḇ, of Ram, of Ḥetsron, of Perets, of Yehuḏah, of Ya’aqoḇ, of Yitsḥaq, of Aḇraham, of Teraḥ, of Naḥor, of Seruḡ, of Re’u, of Peleḡ, of Ěḇer, of Shĕlaḥ, of Qĕynan, of Arpaḵshaḏ, of Shĕm, of Noaḥ, of Lemeḵ, of Methushelaḥ, of Ḥanoḵ, of Yereḏ, of Mahalalĕl, of Qĕynan, of Enosh, of Shĕth, of Aḏam, of Elohim.” (Luke 3:21-38 The Scriptures 1998+)
Those who kept to the commandments of the Almighty could call themselves children of God and by such they were sons or daughters of God. Today it is not otherwise. If we follow the teachings of Jesus Christ and honour his Father also as our Father, God shall be willing to accept us as His children and we shall be able to be a son or a daughter of God and be allowed to call Him our Father who is in heaven.[2]
In the same manner as God by divine fiat created Adam from the dust as Son of God, so in due time He created within the womb of a human female the one who is by the action of the Holy spirit, the supernaturally begotten Son of God. It is surely destructive of straightforward information and revelation to argue that the Son of God did not have his origin in Mary but as an eternal Spirit. This is to dehumanize the Son — to make him essentially non-human, merely a divine visitor disguised as a man, while from the genealogical tree we see the he came forwards from all human beings.
[1] Luke 3: 38 Re. Murdock
[2] After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. (Matthew 6:9 KJV)
+
Preceding article: Jesus begotten Son of God #10 Coming down spirit or flesh seed of Eve
To be continued: 29. The only one + 30. Pre-existence and virginal birth exclude each other
Read also:
- Jesus son of God
- Christian thought: acknowledge that Jesus is the Son of God
- Who is Jesus Christ?
- Who is Jesus Christ? #1 What does the Bible say
- “Son of God” – “God the Son”
- Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father
- Da Vinci Code: Was Jesus Human or Divine?
- To Know God: A Living Faith #2 State of your faith
- Can God become flesh? Kan God vlees worden?
- When we do have to become Christ do we become God?
- A Provission made by God
- Looking for this promise
- God?s Will for Us – Gods Wil voor ons
+++
Related articles
- On the Nature of Christ (christadelphians.wordpress.com)
- A Ransom in Exchange for Many (kingdomherald.ro)
- The Christmas Spirit Is Spreading (watchtower.org)
+ - Rome Marketed and Packaged Christ (jesus-is-not-god.xanga.com)
- Jesus – The Promised Messiah (fromthesunrising.wordpress.com)
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 6 so far )
« Previous Entries






















