What matters who Melchisedek was, seeing we are not told in the Scriptures?

The suggestion that he was Shem is a mere guess, not warranted by “what is written”. The chief reason urged for concluding that he was Melchisedek is, that his death is not recorded; but that is a mere assumption, seeing that of him it is written; “Shem lived after he begat Arphaxad five hundred years” (Gen. xi. 11), which in the light of verse 10, and what is recorded in the context, implies he then died.

There are many reasons for concluding Shem was not Melchisedek; but what matters? Sufficient for us it is to know what is written; that Melchisedek was Melchisedek, and that he was a type of the Lord Jesus Christ (Psalm ex. 4; Heb. v. 6; vii. 15, 17, 21; Gen.xiv· 18).

F. G. J.

One thought on “Melchisedek

Geef een reactie - Give a reaction

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.